​FALSIFYING PETER’S PRIMACY IN THE CHURCH

Paul received the government of god for the church. He was entrusted the government, meaning, he was to take charge over it, he would rule over it. In short, he would be ruler in the government of god in the church. Meaning, the head of the church. 
Col 1:24 Who now rejoice in my sufferings for you, and fill up that which is behind of the afflictions of Christ in my flesh for his body’s sake, which is the church:

Col 1:25 Whereof I am made a minister, according to THE “OIKONOMIA’ OF GOD WHICH IS GIVEN TO ME for you, to fulfil the word of God;
Notice the words in emphasis. Paul was given the “oikonomia” of god. 

What is “oikonomia”?

I will use strongs numbers 1890 to define it. here it is:

G3622  oikonomia  oy-kon-om-ee’-ah
from G3623;
administration (of a household or estate); specially, a (religious) “economy”.
As we can see, “oikonomia” has no other definition than administration. Meaning paul received the administration of god.

How reliable is the greek dictionary I used?

Here is a foreword:

Strong’s numbers

for ScrTR

Adapted from Robinsons (Scrivener Textus Receptus 1894)

A Strong’s number is an (index) number which refers to a Lemma in the Strong’s Lexicon.

James Strong numbered every Hebrew or Greek root word which was found, for ease of reference for his Exhaustive Concordance, first published in 1890.
That speaks about the greek dictionary I used. It is as old as 1890 of james strong’s exhaustive concordance, thus, it is a reliable dictionary we have for the greek bible.

As we can see, oikonomia is defined only as administration and not as stewardship or dispensation which other English translation used. So conclusively, it is the only meaning preferred for oikonomia, the one given for paul.

Therefore Col 1:25 speaks of the administration of god given to paul. 

What is administration of god?

Comparatively, when we say, administration of duterte, it is synonymous as saying the government of duterte. Conclusively, the administration of god is the government of god.

ad•min•is•tra•tion [əd mìnnə stráysh’n]

(plural ad•min•is•tra•tions) 

noun 

 

 

 

 

 

6.  government: a government, especially its executive branch

Microsoft® Encarta® 2009. © 1993-2008 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

If the government of god was given to paul, it only means one thing, he was entrusted the government. Conclusively as a ruler, the head of the government.

Peter’s primacy is not mentioned during this time. Catholics claim that peter was the head as much as he received the keys of heaven cannot be proven as perpetual. Was he higher than paul? It cannot be proven.

Does having the keys of heaven, makes someone higher than the one entrusted with the government. It cannot be, as that someone entrusted the government is logically the highest in position.

How come?

Bec he was entrusted with the government. 

Conclusively, having the keys of heaven doesn’t make one as the highest in position, bec if that is so, then there would be two leader.

It cannot be proven, that having the keys would put one in the highest position.

Peter was in the highest position bec he was the one authorized to feed the sheep and not bec he received the keys. But there is no proof that peter’s primacy continued.

Logically, the one entrusted with the government is the one in the highest position.

How come?

Bec he was entrusted with the government!

Therefore paul was the highest in position over the church.
IS THERE A PROOF TO HIS AUTHORITY?
Yes!

1COR7:17  but as god hath distributed to every man as the Lord has called everyone so let him walk AND SO ORDAIN I IN ALL CHURCHES….
thank you

#inactive_mcgi

​PAPAL HISTORY IS A LIE

CATHOLICS SAY

International Encyclopedia, Volume 20, Page 520 “Roman Catholic Church” There are two equally valid definition of the Catholic Church, comparable to the twofold nature of Jesus Christ, its founder, who was both human and divine.
The World Almanac and Book of Facts & Edition 2009 Page 688 “Roman Catholics” –traditionally founded by Jesus who named St. Peter the 1st vicar, developed in early Christian proselytizing, especially after the conversion of imperial Rome in the 4th century.
Grollier Encyclopedia, Volume V, page 106 “Catholic Church (Gr. Katholikos, universal, general). Term generally applied to the Divine society founded by Jesus Christ, and endowed by the outpouring of the Holy Ghost on the day of Pentecost.
The New Book of Knowledge, Page 287 “Roman Catholic Church” –the history of the Roman Catholic Church begun in an upper room in Jerusalem almost 2,000 years ago. About 120 persons were gathered there. They were followers of Jesus Christ, and they were awaiting the coming of Holy Spirit he had promised to send them from heaven. The day on which the Holy Spirit came down is considered the birthday of the Church. The Church may be described as the society that Jesus founded, which is vitalized by the Spirit of God and organized to a structure which he establish. The history of Roman Catholic Church traces the destinies of that society from its beginning until now.
Tanong: Sino’ng pope ang humalili sa tungkulin ni San Pedro Apostol (33-64) bilang nakikitang pangulo ng Santa Iglesia Catolica matapos siyang patayin sa bungtod ng Vatican?

Sagot: Si Pope St. Linus (67-76).

Tanong: Saan sa Bibliya ang pangalan niya?

Sagot: Sa ikalawang sulat ni Pablo kay Timoteo na Obispo ng Efeso ay binanggit niya ito nang sabihin niya:

“Hurry to arrive before winter. Eubulus, and Pudens, and Linus, and Claudia, and all the brothers greet you”

(2 Timothy 4:21).

Sumunod kay Linus ay sina:

3. St. Anacletus (76-88)

4. St. Clement 1 (88-97)

5. St. Evaristus (97-105)

6. St. Alexander 1 (105-115)

7. St. Sixtus 1 (115-125)

8. St. Telesphorus (125-136)

9. St. Hyginus (136-140)

10. St. Pius 1 (140-155)

261. St. John XXIII (1958-1963)

262. Paul VI (1963-1978)

263. John Paul 1 (1978-1978)

264. St. John Paul II (1978-2005)

265. Benedict XVI (2005-2013)

266. Francis (2013 up to present)
Ang Iglesia Catolica na itinayo ni Cristo ay hindi totoong “natalikod” at “naglaho” tulad ng sinabi ng Iglesia ni Cristo ni Manalo at And Dating Daan ni mommy Elly. Tulad ng isang puno patuloy itong nabubuhay mula year 33. Sa year 2033 ito ay magdadalawang libong taon na. 

Mula Jerusalem ito ay dinala sa Roma (Gawa 23:11). 

Mula sa Roma dinala ito sa Espanya (Roma 15:24).

Mula sa Espanya ay dinala ito sa Pilipinas (Magellan’s expedition) noong year 1521.

Ang Iglesia Catolica sa Pilipinas sa darating na year 2021 ay 500 years na!
Ito ang tunay na Iglesia na mula Roma 16:16 at Gawa 20:28 na magpapatuloy hanggang sa katapusan ng mundo tulad ng ipinangako ni Cristo

(Mateo 28:19-20).

MY RESPONSE:
THERE are errors and inconsistencies in history records such as in Philippine history and one of such is the two dates given to a single historical event called SIGAW SA PUGAD LAWIN…
here is an info from the web:

* SIGAW SA PUGAD LAWIN 

   at ang pagpunit ng cedula *
The Cry of Pugad Lawin or SIGAW SA PUGAD LAWIN alternately and originally referred to as the Cry of Balintawak or Sigaw ng Balintawak was the beginning of the Philippine Revolution against Spanish rule.

At the close of August 1896, members of the Katipunan secret society (Katipuneros) led by Andres Bonifacio rose up in revolt somewhere in an area referred to as Kalookan, wider than the jurisdiction of present-day Caloocan City and overlapping into present-day Quezon City.

Originally the term “Cry” referred to the first skirmish between the Katipuneros and the Civil Guards (Guardia Civil). Other definitions of the term have been made over the years, but today it is popularly understood to refer to the tearing of community tax certificates (cédulas personales) by the rebels to mark their separation from Spain. This was literally accompanied by patriotic shouts.

Because of differing accounts and the ambiguity of place names in these accounts, the exact date and place of the Cry is disputed.From 1908 until 1963, the official stance was that the Cry occurred on August 26 in Balintawak. In 1963 the Philippine government declared a shift to August 23 in Pugad Lawin, Quezon City.

HAVING THAT REALITY, HOW SURE ARE YOU THAT YOUR PAPAL HISTORY IS TRUE WHEN IN FACT THERE ARE ERRORS IN HISTORY?

WHAT IF IT IS A LIE?

There is therefore a possibility that its a lie, unless of course if you could show otherwise…or prove the reliability of your historical sources. If not, it won’t guarantee that indeed it is true, bec of the fact that history records are not inerrant, such as I have proven above.
PAPAL HISTORY IS THEREFORE DOUBTFUL.
THE encyclopedia said that what Jesus established has the official name, THE CATHOLIC CHURCH…referring to the Papal church. ITS A LIE, THUS PROVING HISTORY RECORDS AS INDEED HAVING ERRORS, LIES AND INCONSISTENCIES. There is no substantial proof in the bible. The bible did not call the church, the CATHOLIC CHURCH thus obviously, the encyclopedia is lying.

HAVING THE FACTUALITY OF AN ERRANT HISTORY RECORD, HOW COULD YOU VERIFY YOUR PAPAL HISTORY TO BE TRUE, THEN?

Lastly, It cannot be verified that Linus or Clement of the bible is the same one the catholics have as Pope or Bishop. Its mere claims!

.

#inactive_mcgi