First of all, let me remind you of the fact that this hypocritical church, unmasked, as obscene, malicious and defamatory, not to say the least, deadly, or if not, has high probability to kill as hinted by their oppressive character exalted as virtue and the vindictive, criminal behavioural pattern they have as public record.

You have to note the fact how they are anti-human rights advocates  in such a manner that they prefer defamatory actions than a person’s dignity such as how they maliciously maligned bro eli soriano by promoting porn komiks on TV that portrayed him in acts of sodomy even though without any legal confirmation from any court or legal body that indeed such sodomy is true but simply, doing it in retaliation after bro eli has demolished the core foundation of their faith, initially through their TV exchanges of biblical arguments somewhere in 2000-2002.

Secondly, as abrasion of that demolition, they retaliated by 10+ court cases of libel which alleged offences if analyzed from a logical view are simply, insignificant and light, as to its essence of weight.

Thirdly, they edited videos of bro eli to portray him in a negative fashion and proudly, as though a good christian, attacked him verbally in that essence of fabricated lies and deception.

Fourthly, they summoned for the Abu sayyaf to track eli divulging his whereabouts.

Fifth, they threatened him live on TV, to have a funeral service fetch him from the airport, with red carpet and candles, and as though to make it appear moral, laugh and chided, “rest in peace!”…

These facts are consistent nature of that church in regards to its treatment of bro eli, though they seem to appear like meek sheep, doing charitable works and humanitarian efforts for the needy but in essence sugarcoats by that charade of loving their fellowman, which in essence, is just a show, bec of the intermittent manner how in many times they oppressed us, THE CHURCH OF GOD or mcgi, their most formidable archrival.

Much so that lately, they oppressed even their own family members like angel and Lottie manalo, siblings of their leader, the Cain of modern times, Eduardo manalo.

Let us look and ponder on these realities, as illustrated below.

Brute force was used trying to expel Angel and company. Humanitarian efforts were absent but conceited, power-showy bully dominated the INC domain in that effort to embodies its church identity–or notoriety– a powerhouse.

The true church however has these distinction:

2 Corinthians 9:7
[7]Every man according as he purposeth in his heart, so let him give(contribution, gospel, JUDGMENT) not grudgingly, or of ANAGKE (constraint or force) for God loveth a cheerful giver.

Philippians 2:15
[15]That ye may be blameless and harmless, the sons of God, without rebuke, in the midst of a crooked and perverse nation, among whom ye shine as lights in the world;

Luke 3:14 Do violence to no man

Obviously, true Christians never use force to express its faith such that he must not be forced to do anything or use force to impose his faith likewise judgment. Brute force as evidently applied to Angel’s expulsion by INC is a testimony of unchristian behaviour.

2 Corinthians 9:7
[7]Every man according as he purposeth in his heart, so let him give(contribution, gospel, JUDGMENT) not grudgingly, or of ANAGKE (constraint or force) for God loveth a cheerful giver.

It is conclusive therefore to have an impression that INC is a conceited, megalomaniac, power-showy, bully and atrocious, human right violator and most prominently an oppressor.

Refer below for their defense ⬇

They argued, no demolition happened. Let us say, its true, though its a matter of claims. It appears like his word against their word. But however, it was, there was no humanitarian effort for family members to at least have privilege of humanitarian consideration consistently as necessary. Yet considering their statement, their unwillingness to prove their side but instead putting the burden of proof on angel is clearly a manifestation of evasion. Why won’t they vindicate themselves? Is not video taping it so hard to prove there was no demolition?

INC we doubt you. Unwilling to vindicate oneself? Heh!?

What were there alibi for the expulsion?

The reason for the expulsion measure (coercion) was bec of paranoia, suspicion and presumption of security threat. Thus they were asking, don’t we have any right to protect ourselves? Therefore, they took grave measure to alleviate their paranoia through legal means. May I ask, do you expel a tenant bec of unproven doubts of security threat?

Bec you’re paranoid, you have to coerce one to leave residence? Legal or not, it was coercion. Coercion in the sense that, there was no compulsory reason to do so but bec they base it on impulsive, reckless, delusive presumption of security threat and bec you were delusional? It was yet unproven that there was threat of any kind.

1 Thessalonians 5:21
[21]Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.

Beside the fact that there was yet an active court order allowing them to stay.

Now, where is the christian principles applied in these brutal actions, to expel someone in need of a house bec of mere presumption, suspicion or delusion? Its unfair.

Where was bullying in these, power-showy and oppression?

Clearly, they were coerced to evacuate, by legal means or not, there was no justifiable reason. Its inhumane knowing these are your blood relatives. They are somehow family–a responsibility in times of need. It makes your charity works seems a front.

What is the reason, angel and co. must be expelled? It is as they say, Angel was harboring what appears to be in “battle mode” hothead who were trained in the military to kill. What? You based judgment from “what appears” to be in battle mode as reason for expulsion? WHAT APPEARS! that is the core reason for expulsion. It is presumption of evil. Thus, as they admitted, there relentless action was bec they suspect they are under security threat. THEREFORE MANALO WAS EXPELLED BEC INC GUESSED THEY WERE UNDER THREAT BEC SOME ALLEGEDLY HOTHEAD WAS IN THE PREMISES, SUCH THAT, IT ENDANGER SECURITY!  But why expel Angel and not prevent the allegedly notorious persons and blocked away?

How was he a hothead?

According to this ➡

He was a magdalo who fought the government. He pointed a gun to an INC. He was charged with frustrated murder and direct assault. (What’s that got to do with angel?!)

Being that, as reason enough, INC believed they were under threat. Thus the necessary injunction for expulsion. Sufficient reason? If so, what makes angel liable for expulsion even with the fact that he harbored hothead/s? Was it fair knowing that he’s a family?  INC said suspicious masked men were in the premises. So? Masked men are everywhere. Motor rider, passengers, commuters etc…so what’s with it? Suspicious ? Yes! But certainly, they are assassins? Or villains?

The mere fact that INC lacked solid proof to support security threat, as certain, it makes it look like they did drastic offensive just bec of suspicion, delusion and paranoia, whereas the fair thing to do was, prove all things as definite and certain. Hotheads as security companions makes you a security threat?! Mama mia!

1 Thessalonians 5:21
[21]Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.

Clearly, it was an unfair objective. There was unfair reckless inconsiderate misjudgment. And constraint! And coercion to evacuate against freewill just bec of suspected security threat wherein lack of sufficient proof, prejudiced Angel and co. merely bec of suspicion. Clearly, its an authoritarian kind of movement.

What is that again? Would I not take legal measures for security purposes bec I suspect a hothead is in the premises thus necessarily ejecting an individual presumed guilty as security threat?

Come again? Presumed?

These, are proofs that there was injustice done in the name of religion. Most unfortunately though to a blood relative.

Love. Sigh!

Lastly, I would want to inform you that many of the libel cases were decided in favor of bro eli, he was still in Brazil propagating the gospel, and I believe until that time that he is secure from those that wanted to kill him, it is at the most vital need for him, to be at an exile status, at the expense of the two rape cases against him, by someone that joined INC, and being sensationalized to that level of public judgment, wherein, bias is either by ignorance or religion, it is for the best, that he should clarify all these in a future setting.

Ecclesiastes 3:1,11

[1]To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven:

[11]He hath made every thing beautiful in his time…