THE INC’s PICK-ONLY-SORIANO “ATAPANG DAHIL IGLESIA KAMI” LAWSUITS

As we all know, Iglesia ni Cristo, as an institution attacked its religious archrival, mcgi, through unprecedented 10+ libel court cases against our minister, bro eli soriano. 

I am just wondering. Is there consistency with this kind of treatment as necessary responses from allegedly offensive statements even from shallow, superficial invectives such as in the case of bro eli saying, a whore prostitutes through her organ while you prostitutes through your mouth being a verbally bad mouth, referring to a lame-minded minister? Though it was not a court case but a retaliatory action through MTRCB to halt eli’s TV program, it was still, in like manner how libel cases were made, that is bec of shallow and minor offenses. 

Was there consistency, that INC always resort to this kind of lame and diversionary religiosity suing apparently malicious attackers of their church, even pointlessly, towards overkill? If none, how come bro eli was abused with multiple senseless lawsuits? Was it bec they were trying to prevent him from totally demolishing their doctrinal integrity? Thus the need to make desperate measures in desperate times through prejudice?

Its overkill. Who else did INC sued in like manner, an overkill™?

If none, apparently, its a transparent and clear testament that reflects the seemingly implication: INC resort to prejudicial self-preservation. They cannot tackle doctrinal damage thus resorting to unfair damage control.

In short, its a testament of abuse and evasion from doctrinal issues.

Why do I say so?

They did not sue this one that lambasted their church, maliciously, more than the nature of bro Eli’s alleged offense. 

Let’s think for awhile folks! Only soriano was charged with 10+libel cases? But this one, who abused them beyond the scope of Eli’s alleged offense, was never sued?

Or if it was, let us know!

source: https://iglesianicristoreadme.blogspot.com/2016/12/erano-manalo-billionaire-preacher.html

It say,

  • INC IS A MONEY MAKING BUSINESS INSTITUTION
  • ERANO MANALO IS THE GREEDY, “GANID, DAYUKDOK”, EXPLOIT-MONEY-MAKING-PROFITTER OF THE CHURCH

Now, tell us, if there was no premeditated plan to persecute and destroy or even kill bro eli soriano as he claimed, how would you justify the 10+libel cases he was distinct to endure while those that negatively highlighted erano manalo as exploiter and, profiteer scheming from a business institution with the guise of a religion was never been touched?

Now tell us, am I correct?

Were they charged or prosecuted? Or were they silenced?

Vindicate yourselves but does it matter?

If not, it would always be doubtful how come 10+libel cases, an overkill, was charged against eli soriano while a more serious offense was apparently bypassed?

Lastly, whoelse did you charged in like manner, an overkill?

ANALYSIS: IGLESIA NI CRISTO’S “ANTISOCIAL” LAWSUITS ON ELI SORIANO IS PERSECUTION!

Let’s us look at one of these “shallow” ground for such “irrational, inhumane, completely ireful” resort was:

Let us see, how “shallow” the offense was!

“MASAHOL KA PA SA BABAENG PATUTOT, YUNG BABAENG PATUTOT YUNG GUMAGANA E YUNG IBABA, YUNG KAY MICHAEL YUNG GUMAGANA E YUNG ITAAS…”

What does it mean?

On spectator’s perspective, bro eli seem to refer to Michael’s verbal attack on soriano, thus when he compared his “mouth” as prostituting metaphorically worst than a prostitute way, it was actually, true! 

Describing something in metaphorical comparison to a prostitute way is actually, freedom of speech, much so that it has truthful basis. And besides, it is a religious right! for god’s sake! 

ITS PERSECUTION!

ITS COMPULSION IN RELIGION!

YOU FORCE US NOT TO PRACTICE OUR RELIGION!

ITS SUPPRESSION OF HUMAN RIGHTS!

CALLING YOU A DOG IS MUCH WORST, AS YOU EXHIBITS CHARACTERISTICS OF DOGS!

and its our religious right to call you dogs! Manalo et al!

Isaiah 56:11

[11]Yea, they are greedy dogs which can never have enough, and they are shepherds that cannot understand: they all look to their own way, every one for his gain (such as in terms of prestige through prejudice!) from his quarter.

Calling you dogs as our religious right to accurse appropriately all dogs like you! IS OUR RELIGIOUS RIGHT!

Galatians 1:9

[9]As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.

Thus bro eli has the right to accurse you in a manner of metaphorically comparing you to sexual perverts’ manner of prostituting herself as his religious right to accurse.

BY WHAT AUTHORITY DOES A CHRISTIAN HAS RIGHT TO SUE ANOTHER PERSON OUTSIDE HIS CHURCH?

What biblical sanction permits us to pursue court measures against an alleged offender?

Proverbs 3:30

[30]Strive not with a man without cause, if he have done thee no harm.

By what biblical context does authorized us to strive with an offender? Which kind of offenses does god permits for us to strive against an offender?

It cannot be anything!

And by saying, “strive”, one of such is to “strive” legally through court measures, but which kind of an offense, (even shallow?), have god given us right to retaliate to?

GOD GAVE US THE RIGHT TO ENGAGE THE FORCE OF THE JUDICIARY AS HE SAID,

1 Peter 2:13-16

[13]Submit yourselves to every ordinance of man for the Lord’s sake: whether it be to the king, as supreme;

[14]Or unto governors, as unto them that are sent by him for the punishment of evildoers, and for the praise of them that do well.

[15]For so is the will of God, that with well doing ye may put to silence the ignorance of foolish men:

[16]As free, and not using your liberty for a cloke of maliciousness, but as the servants of God.


By giving authority to governments to make laws and punishment implies that god permits the judiciary govt to impose punishments thus implying and emphatic, that god, permits lawsuits, which as a divine sanction permits christians as privilege for it, to sue any offender, as a form of submission to these particular ordinances.

But the question is, what kind of offenses should christians as an authorized act, are we privileged by god to prefer court measures, considering that god himself, as a christian value has sanctioned for us that we should take offenses patiently!

PATIENTLY MEANS, TO BEAR WITHOUT RETALIATION!

1 Peter 2:20

[20]For what glory is it, if, when ye be buffeted for your faults, ye shall take it patiently? but if, when ye do well, and suffer for it, ye take it patiently, this is acceptable with God.

Even, fleeing from such offenses is an option, if so that we cannot forbear! Exemplified by bro eli after the so-called persecution you hurled at him, constantly, apparently like a true blooded sociopath!
Matthew 10:23

[23]But when they persecute you in this city, flee ye into another: for verily I say unto you, Ye shall not have gone over the cities of Israel, till the Son of man be come. 

Acts 8:1

 And at that time there was a great persecution against the church which was at Jerusalem; and they were all scattered abroad throughout the regions of Judaea and Samaria, except the apostles.

Logically, having these as context, as sufficient for correct interpretation, we could conclude that, we have to take offenses PATIENTLY, WITHOUT RETALIATION, unless of course, if circumstantial situations would push us to inevitable responses such as imposing lawsuits against an offender, in times as suggested by biblical context, when things are not tolerable or if it exceeds, the biblical ethics of forebearance, as god said:

1 Peter 2:20

[20]For what glory is it, if, when ye be buffeted for your faults, ye shall take it patiently? but if, when ye do well, and suffer for it, ye take it patiently, this is acceptable with God.

Especially, the supreme authorities, in the church forbear all forms of menace, so as it says,

Ephesians 6:9

[9]And, ye supreme, do the same things unto them, forbearing menace knowing that your Master also is in heaven; neither is there respect of persons with him.


BIBLICAL CONTEXT SAY, WE ARE TO TAKE OFFENSES PATIENTLY UNTIL THE TIME WE CANNOT FORBEAR! AND AS IMPLIED, IF THERE ARE NO OTHER OPTION!

Therefore, having these as premise, what authority, right or privilege by biblical sanction mobilized you for such apparently “sociopathic” inclination to persecute bro eli through multiple “inhumane” “suppression of human rights!” such as lawsuits of libel against him?
Without any, it is therefore confirmatory of your apparently sociopathic, without conscience, treatment of our church by your deliberate contempt of bro Eli’s human right and right of religion, much so, that all your libel lawsuits were “shallow-based”, tolerable, which if you cannot justify through biblical means is manifestation of your lawless and again “antisocial” tendency called, persecution!

FOR THE LOVE OF THE BROTHERHOOD

DYB..