THE HYPOCRITE IGLESIA NI CRISTO LINGAP PROJECT

Let’s see how this giant and powerhouse religion is actually using humanitarian projects such as free housing for the poor, insincere and hypocritical, as a propandist show-off. In short, a likely front for gain, influence and prestige. Sort of a promotional package for their notorious church. Before that let’s see about its pseudo-charity.

Source: inquirer.net

With an apparently underlying motive, they used a likely deception as by far introductory to its apparently real objective–exploiting the poor as lucrative agents of promoting their church. They claimed concern for poverty alleviation through generosity, which goes along its intention of evangelism or spiritual enrichment as the two-fold objective of their Lingap projects. Does it appear genuine? let’s emphasized again:

Why do I say that these seemingly kindness and charity has an apparently underlying motive and this promotional package–housing project– is hypocritical, in terms of really, a sincere charity. A front?

Their real color has been exposed when they tried to be anti-humanitarian to Angel Manalo, instead become inconsiderate scarecrows, that is by playing aggresive, coercive force of depriving Angel of a house that is by an attempt to mercilessly kick-out Angel Manalo from residence through court measure bec of a housing issue and hunches of security threat. The hypocrites were giving houses for the poor but when it comes to Angel Manalo, they suddenly cease from being a considerate, merciful humanitarian powerhouse, and declined to give him housing as necessarily needed?

Charitable? Are you indeed? 

You give housing for the poor but none for Angel, but rather prefer him to be without s house? Its paradox to the cause of your Lingap project. 

Is that not hypocrisy? 

Your humanitarian efforts as actually a farce? Where you humanitarian to Angel by stripping him off a house? Looks like they really love their fellow but do they indeed?

They don’t love Angel in need of a house. Much disappointedly, Angel is their minister’s blood relative. 

Have they acted as real Christians?

James 2:8-9

[8]If ye fulfil the royal law according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy fellow as thyself, ye do well:

[9]But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors.

Hello!? Do you love your fellow indeed? What you did to angel manalo is a platform for a realistic view of what really Iglesia NI Cristo is, in terms of sincere humanitarian endeavor, that is, a hypocrite. Matt7:12 is a direct assault to the integrity of your charity works, destroying its credibility, by how you have acted as extractor of residential privilege. Matt7:12 says, if you wish anyone or Angel to be in like manner as reciprocal in times of your need,  you should have made the initiative of giving him a house in his dire need. 

You didn’t thus the Lingap project by how it looks, is indeed a pretentious showmanship project. What do you call someone exhibiting anti-humanitarian attributes toward someone but as though, a real public servant? 

Hypocrite! Pretender ! Pseudo-christian!

HAS IGLESIA NI CRISTO THE CAPACITY TO KILL?

Below is a partial reproduction of Maya Agoncillo blog, an ex-INC, testifying how she was demystified on the true nature of INC thus leaving it for good. I would extract excerpts from her testimony as she wrote in her blog. You could read hers here: Click here!

Excerpt 1

She likewise knew how INC made a death threat on Bro Eli Soriano live on TV, as they threatened him, that Amurao, a funeral service would fetch him at the airport with red carpet, candles and finally saying, “rest in peace” in pretense of jovial ambience.

Were they serious?

They might say, could we incriminate ourselves by making serious death threats on public television?

On the assumption that it was just a harmless bluff, could it indeed be logical to make such, as loose and careless prank, without any grain of seriousness, after there was undeniable efforts to destroy him, malign him, and persecute him, where malice was clearly an element of these and not simply a harmless discontent?

I am speaking about the malicious attacks you did on him such as editing his video and portraying him negatively on live TV, likewise, portraying him as sodomizer through propagating porn komiks of him in acts of sodomy, without any validation from legal sources confirming sodomy. It was pure malicious defamation.

And indignantly, to the point of bereft reasons your hatred of him was evident when you accuse him of many things, and from small shallow things, you mounted charges of him in successive feat, and as evidently, vocalized it through, baseless ill description of him as extortionist, plunderer and kidnapper, as a form of brainwashing people, gullible INC members to have his reputation tarnished not to forget the fact that you attempted to marred him in infamy through video editing and porn komiks, portraying him negatively, and spiced it up with detrimental commentaries.

Even to brazenly called for Abu Sayyaf to track him down giving specification of his whereabouts.

watch here!

Its all malicious mischief bent for serious destruction!

Excerpt 2

Having these as unequivocal pattern of behaviour, was there no malice indeed in the same behavioural pattern with your violent ministers and members’ volatile past, then when you gave that apparently death threat?

Could your violent behaviour in the past be unrelated in matter of religious morals, with the present treatment you have for soriano, if we are to dig deeper and explore on the historical paradigm of your church, how violence and killing was inherently part of your past? Was it just coincidence that your ministers/members have been reported many times in acts of senseless violence, kuyog, and killings, as necessarily unrelated in terms of principle, ethics and norms from your alleged death threat on soriano, where they do this publicly in utter seriousness and your death threat are mere jovial prank?!

Or?

Could it be that it is a reflection of a behavioural pattern as inherently your nature, to kill-esp for the messenger-is holiness?

Excerpt 3

Here are some records:

Excerpt 4

source: Click here!

Excerpt 5

Source: Click here!

Iglesia Ni Cristo has THOUSANDS of convicted criminal members (robbers, rapists, murderers)

Iglesia Ni Cristo has THOUSANDS of convicted criminal members (robbers, rapists, murderers)
Iglesia Ni Cristo has THOUSANDS of convicted criminal members (robbers, rapists, murderers)
Iglesia Ni Cristo has THOUSANDS of convicted criminal members (robbers, rapists, murderers)
Iglesia Ni Cristo has THOUSANDS of convicted criminal members (robbers, rapists, murderers)
Iglesia Ni Cristo has THOUSANDS of convicted criminal members (robbers, rapists, murderers)
Iglesia Ni Cristo has THOUSANDS of convicted criminal members (robbers, rapists, murderers)
Iglesia Ni Cristo has THOUSANDS of convicted criminal members (robbers, rapists, murderers)
Iglesia Ni Cristo has THOUSANDS of convicted criminal members (robbers, rapists, murderers)
Iglesia Ni Cristo has THOUSANDS of convicted criminal members (robbers, rapists, murderers)
Iglesia Ni Cristo has THOUSANDS of convicted criminal members (robbers, rapists, murderers)
Iglesia Ni Cristo has THOUSANDS of convicted criminal members (robbers, rapists, murderers)
Iglesia Ni Cristo has THOUSANDS of convicted criminal members (robbers, rapists, murderers)
Iglesia Ni Cristo has THOUSANDS of convicted criminal members (robbers, rapists, murderers)
Iglesia Ni Cristo has THOUSANDS of convicted criminal members (robbers, rapists, murderers)

Were these just a random unrelated behaviours without any link to religious moral custom?

“TO KILL-ESP FOR THE MESSENGER-IS HOLINESS”???

Were they not accustomed to it, to violent behaviours, to killings?! Let witnesses divulge an apparently realistic monster.

Excerpt 6

Excerpt 7

Excerpt 8

Excerpt 9

Perhaps, you have excommunicated convicted criminals and killers, as you would do for any alibi you would concoct, but the mere fact that a pervading and consensual sense of violence and repulsion is seen in your midst attests to what accustomization there is, amidst your church.

A shallow cursing and invectives, merits retaliative measures as lawsuits?

Did you not do that to Bro Eli?!

What was it for?!

Destruction!

That as clear evidence of what I am talking about. You’re accustomed to vengeful tendencies where a simple invectives is not tolerated but must be recompense with the offenders utmost if possible, torment!

You don’t care for welfare, inconsiderate bunch of sociopaths!

Here is how your members react to Mon Tulfo’s careless tirade:

By what biblical sanction do you make charges even from minor offenses as invectives?

Is it coincidence how you’re intolerant and vindictive even from minor offenses with how news reports testifies of your ministers/members numerous murderous tendencies?!

Or is it bec it is inherently by the fact that somehow it was their accustomization inculcated through the years?

Could criminal behaviours be just a wayward sliver as Judas was to the church or Ananias and sapphira was but not actually a church responsdibility?

Or could these volume of testimonies, and actual criminal realities be just a hideous and tantamountly, a consequential behaviour, to how you have nurtured your church, indirectly as a creeping unseen hand, has fashioned in many a criminal ego?!

Thus when you gave that death threat for Bro Eli Soriano, was it just a mindless bluff, having in your midst, the criminal behavioural pattern observed consistently or if not, lavishly in the past where nothing of it was done insincerely, or mindlessly, as a simple jovial bluff, whereas yours are mindless, non-malicious bluff?!

The question is, has Iglesia ni Cristo any capacity to kill, esp their most hated enemy, Bro Eli Sorianoa?

Is it impossible that a church with demonic working force in it has no capacity to kill?

Indeed, Erano Manalo, their dead leader, they believed spoke by divine guidance, declared the INC’s administration as having satan’s dominion as he said:

Source: Click here!

Manalo admitted his church was overcome by satan as evil has dominion in his church as he said, all his church workers are instruments of Satan, through these workers unanymous deception schemes toward the administration making satan a working power over the church  and thus, its authorities were a corrupted bunch as lies, Manalo claimed was satan’s have become pervading over them.  Could Satan ever have dominion over the church?!

No!

Never would the glory of Satan ever prevails in the church as gods glory is forever in it and the church was meant to remove us from Satan’s power so as these verses say,

Now, could a church, with demonic influence has no capacity to kill?!

Now, what’s the question again!?

HAS IGLESIA NI CRISTO THE CAPACITY TO KILL, ESP BRO ELI SORIANO!?

WHERE THEY JUST BLUFFING WHEN THEY GAVE THE DEATH THREAT TO BRO ELI?!

Z

RECAP:

  • At least two testimonies of  killing consent from INC!
  • INC made a live TV death threat for soriano.
  • Malicious destruction of soriano by ministers through black propaganda.
  • Vindictive tendencies of INC for retaliatory charges  even from minor offenses were evident.
  • Erano Manalo claimed INC administrative body as almost integrally demonic!
  • ELI SORIANO RUN AWAY TO ANOTHER COUNTRY BEC OF INC! (You dont run away like that without life at stake)
  • AMANSEC TESTIMONY OF A KILLING MISSION FROM INC TO KILL BRO ELI
  • NUMEROUS REPORTS OF MINISTERS AND MANY MEMBERS HAVING VIOLENT BEHAVIOURS AND  KILLING RECORDS!
  • EXCERPT 8&9 SPEAKS ABOUT A HEAD DEACON PLANNING TO KILL AND CESAR ADAMOS HUNTED LIKE CRIMINAL BEC OF CHALLENGING INC.
  • EXCERPT 3 AN EX-INC TESTIMONY OF HITMEN IN THE INC.
  • A WIDESPREAD BELIEF AMONG INC MEMBERS THAT IT IS HOLY TO KILL ESP IN MATTERS THAT CONCERNS THE MESSENGER
  • INC MADE A DEATH THREAT FOR SORIANO
  • AND LASTLY, THE “ATAPANG NGA MGA TAO” THE INC CHURCH MADE DEATH THREAT FOR ELI SORIANO!⚠

NO CAPACITY TO KILL!?

Do you see the consistency of a behavioural pattern??

Lastly, as the final nail to the coffin, is the public record, how that INC expressed an evil and wanton desire for Eli to be brutally killed.

Now folks! You do the math!

Note: all excerpts were from Maya Agoncillo’s blog. Click here! unless the source is otherwise indicated.

THE IGLESIA NI CRISTO IS A POWER-SHOWY, BULLY AND OPPRESSOR!

First of all, let me remind you of the fact that this hypocritical church, unmasked, as obscene, malicious and defamatory, not to say the least, deadly, or if not, has high probability to kill as hinted by their oppressive character exalted as virtue and the vindictive, criminal behavioural pattern they have as public record.

You have to note the fact how they are anti-human rights advocates  in such a manner that they prefer defamatory actions than a person’s dignity such as how they maliciously maligned bro eli soriano by promoting porn komiks on TV that portrayed him in acts of sodomy even though without any legal confirmation from any court or legal body that indeed such sodomy is true but simply, doing it in retaliation after bro eli has demolished the core foundation of their faith, initially through their TV exchanges of biblical arguments somewhere in 2000-2002.

Secondly, as abrasion of that demolition, they retaliated by 10+ court cases of libel which alleged offences if analyzed from a logical view are simply, insignificant and light, as to its essence of weight.

Thirdly, they edited videos of bro eli to portray him in a negative fashion and proudly, as though a good christian, attacked him verbally in that essence of fabricated lies and deception.

Fourthly, they summoned for the Abu sayyaf to track eli divulging his whereabouts.

Fifth, they threatened him live on TV, to have a funeral service fetch him from the airport, with red carpet and candles, and as though to make it appear moral, laugh and chided, “rest in peace!”…

These facts are consistent nature of that church in regards to its treatment of bro eli, though they seem to appear like meek sheep, doing charitable works and humanitarian efforts for the needy but in essence sugarcoats by that charade of loving their fellowman, which in essence, is just a show, bec of the intermittent manner how in many times they oppressed us, THE CHURCH OF GOD or mcgi, their most formidable archrival.

Much so that lately, they oppressed even their own family members like angel and Lottie manalo, siblings of their leader, the Cain of modern times, Eduardo manalo.

Let us look and ponder on these realities, as illustrated below.

Brute force was used trying to expel Angel and company. Humanitarian efforts were absent but conceited, power-showy bully dominated the INC domain in that effort to embodies its church identity–or notoriety– a powerhouse.

The true church however has these distinction:

2 Corinthians 9:7
[7]Every man according as he purposeth in his heart, so let him give(contribution, gospel, JUDGMENT) not grudgingly, or of ANAGKE (constraint or force) for God loveth a cheerful giver.

Philippians 2:15
[15]That ye may be blameless and harmless, the sons of God, without rebuke, in the midst of a crooked and perverse nation, among whom ye shine as lights in the world;

Luke 3:14 Do violence to no man

Obviously, true Christians never use force to express its faith such that he must not be forced to do anything or use force to impose his faith likewise judgment. Brute force as evidently applied to Angel’s expulsion by INC is a testimony of unchristian behaviour.

2 Corinthians 9:7
[7]Every man according as he purposeth in his heart, so let him give(contribution, gospel, JUDGMENT) not grudgingly, or of ANAGKE (constraint or force) for God loveth a cheerful giver.

It is conclusive therefore to have an impression that INC is a conceited, megalomaniac, power-showy, bully and atrocious, human right violator and most prominently an oppressor.

Refer below for their defense ⬇

They argued, no demolition happened. Let us say, its true, though its a matter of claims. It appears like his word against their word. But however, it was, there was no humanitarian effort for family members to at least have privilege of humanitarian consideration consistently as necessary. Yet considering their statement, their unwillingness to prove their side but instead putting the burden of proof on angel is clearly a manifestation of evasion. Why won’t they vindicate themselves? Is not video taping it so hard to prove there was no demolition?

INC we doubt you. Unwilling to vindicate oneself? Heh!?

What were there alibi for the expulsion?

The reason for the expulsion measure (coercion) was bec of paranoia, suspicion and presumption of security threat. Thus they were asking, don’t we have any right to protect ourselves? Therefore, they took grave measure to alleviate their paranoia through legal means. May I ask, do you expel a tenant bec of unproven doubts of security threat?

Bec you’re paranoid, you have to coerce one to leave residence? Legal or not, it was coercion. Coercion in the sense that, there was no compulsory reason to do so but bec they base it on impulsive, reckless, delusive presumption of security threat and bec you were delusional? It was yet unproven that there was threat of any kind.

1 Thessalonians 5:21
[21]Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.

Beside the fact that there was yet an active court order allowing them to stay.

Now, where is the christian principles applied in these brutal actions, to expel someone in need of a house bec of mere presumption, suspicion or delusion? Its unfair.

Where was bullying in these, power-showy and oppression?

Clearly, they were coerced to evacuate, by legal means or not, there was no justifiable reason. Its inhumane knowing these are your blood relatives. They are somehow family–a responsibility in times of need. It makes your charity works seems a front.

What is the reason, angel and co. must be expelled? It is as they say, Angel was harboring what appears to be in “battle mode” hothead who were trained in the military to kill. What? You based judgment from “what appears” to be in battle mode as reason for expulsion? WHAT APPEARS! that is the core reason for expulsion. It is presumption of evil. Thus, as they admitted, there relentless action was bec they suspect they are under security threat. THEREFORE MANALO WAS EXPELLED BEC INC GUESSED THEY WERE UNDER THREAT BEC SOME ALLEGEDLY HOTHEAD WAS IN THE PREMISES, SUCH THAT, IT ENDANGER SECURITY!  But why expel Angel and not prevent the allegedly notorious persons and blocked away?

How was he a hothead?

According to this ➡ http://incdefendernomore.org/2017/03/10/36ts-when-gods-hand-moves/

He was a magdalo who fought the government. He pointed a gun to an INC. He was charged with frustrated murder and direct assault. (What’s that got to do with angel?!)

Being that, as reason enough, INC believed they were under threat. Thus the necessary injunction for expulsion. Sufficient reason? If so, what makes angel liable for expulsion even with the fact that he harbored hothead/s? Was it fair knowing that he’s a family?  INC said suspicious masked men were in the premises. So? Masked men are everywhere. Motor rider, passengers, commuters etc…so what’s with it? Suspicious ? Yes! But certainly, they are assassins? Or villains?

The mere fact that INC lacked solid proof to support security threat, as certain, it makes it look like they did drastic offensive just bec of suspicion, delusion and paranoia, whereas the fair thing to do was, prove all things as definite and certain. Hotheads as security companions makes you a security threat?! Mama mia!

1 Thessalonians 5:21
[21]Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.

Clearly, it was an unfair objective. There was unfair reckless inconsiderate misjudgment. And constraint! And coercion to evacuate against freewill just bec of suspected security threat wherein lack of sufficient proof, prejudiced Angel and co. merely bec of suspicion. Clearly, its an authoritarian kind of movement.

What is that again? Would I not take legal measures for security purposes bec I suspect a hothead is in the premises thus necessarily ejecting an individual presumed guilty as security threat?

Come again? Presumed?

These, are proofs that there was injustice done in the name of religion. Most unfortunately though to a blood relative.

Love. Sigh!

Lastly, I would want to inform you that many of the libel cases were decided in favor of bro eli, he was still in Brazil propagating the gospel, and I believe until that time that he is secure from those that wanted to kill him, it is at the most vital need for him, to be at an exile status, at the expense of the two rape cases against him, by someone that joined INC, and being sensationalized to that level of public judgment, wherein, bias is either by ignorance or religion, it is for the best, that he should clarify all these in a future setting.

Ecclesiastes 3:1,11

[1]To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven:

[11]He hath made every thing beautiful in his time…

DESTROYING INCs CLAIM THAT OUTSIDE THE CHURCH THERE IS NO SALVATION.

n Free Mode

See Photos

facebook

Edit · View Edit History · Delete

The Iglesia Ni Cristo Cyberspace Watchdog shared Ang Sulo‘s post.

DESTROYING INCs CLAIM THAT OUTSIDE THE CHURCH THERE IS NO SALVATION.
.
.
INC SAID:
“tinitiyak ng biblia na ang mga nasa labas (ng iglesia) ay hahatulan o parurusahan ng dios. Kaya isang malaking kamalian ang paniniwalang makakapareho lamang na sa dios ang lahat ng relihiyon at walang pagkakaiba ang kaanib at hinde kaanib sa iglesia ni kristo”

BAKIT DAW INC LAMANG ANG MALILIGTAS KASI SILA LANG DAW ANG PINANGAKUAN NG BUHAY NA WALANG HANGGAN.
INC SAID:
“pansinin muli na hinde sinasabi sa biblia na ang lahat ng tao ay mga tagapagmana ng mga pangako. Sa halip ang mga Kay cristo ang magmamana ng mga pangako.”

And that promise as they say are eternal life and the new heaven and new earth.
That as they implied were promised only to INC and not outside it, bec outside, e PARUSA AT HINDI KALIGTASAN..

DAHIL DAW LAHAT NG NASA LABAS E WALANG DIOS.
INC SAID:
“Hiwalay kayo noon Kay kristo at hinde kabilang sa israel . wala kayong bahagi sa tipan at pangako…wala kayong dios o pagasa sa kaligtasan…” (Efe 2:12)

IYAN DAW ANG LAHAT NG NASA LABAS NG INC. WALANG KALIGTASAN AT PAPARUSAHAN….

Tama kaya sila?
Wala kayang kaligtasan ang nasa labas ng inc kahit gaano pa sila kabuti?
Hinde kaya kinikilala ng dios ang mga mabubuting tao dahil ignorante sila kaya wala silang dios?

ANO KAYA IBIG SABIHIN NA ANG MGA HENTIL E WALANG PARTE SA ISRAEL SA MGA TIPAN AT PANGAKO
AT ANONG IBIG SABIHIN NG WALA SILANG DIOS?

ito bay tumutukoy sa panahong kristyano?
Hinde maipagkakaila na sa panahon ng lumang israel, sa labas nito e walang dios.

2KINGS 5:15 BEHOLD NOW I KNOW THAT THERE IS NO GOD IN ALL THE EARTH BUT IN ISRAEL…

yan ay sa panahong mosaic o lumang Israel pero sa panahong kristyano ba walang dios at kaligtasan sa nangasalabas ng iglesia?

Tingnan natin…
Sabi ng dios, bago nilalang ng dios ang mundo, pinili na niya beforehand kung sino sa mga tao in the future ang mga kinikilala niyang mga anak niya. 
HE PREDSTINATED THEM AS HIS SONS.
EPH 1:4-5 ACCDG AS HE HAS CHOSEN US BEFORE THE CREATION OF THE WORLD…HAVING PREDESTINATED US UNTO THE ADOPTION OF CHILDREN…TO HIMSELF.
ROM 8:15 BUT YE HAVE RECEIVED THE SPIRIT OF ADOPTION WHEREBY YE SAY, ABBA FATHER..

ang mga anak ba ng dios na yan lahat papasok sa iglesia?
Oo, tulad ng pangako ni Jesus,

JOHN 10:16 THEM I WILL BRING…AND THERE WILL BE ONE FOLD…

Paano?
Halimbawa sa panahon ni kristo, me mabubuting tao sa malayong lugar na hinde nito naabot at silay namatay, paparusahan din ba sila?

OO DAW SABI NG INC KASI WALA SILA SA IGLESIA.

Totoo kaya yon?

Hinde po, kasi me mga mabubuting tao sa labas ng iglesia na maliligtas tulad nito:

ROM 2:13-15 FOR NOT THE HEARERS OF THE LAW ARE INNOCENT BEFORE GOD BUT THE DOERS OF THE LAW SHALL BE INNOCENT
FOR WHEN THE GENTILES WHO HAVE NOT THE LAW (yung mga nasa labas ng iglesia na hinde sakop ng law of Christ) DO BY NATURE THE THINGS CONTAINED IN THE LAW, HAVING NOT THE LAW, ARE A LAW UNTO THEMSELVES, WHICH SHOW THE WORK OF THE LAW WRITTEN IN THEIR HEARTS…

Meaning, sa labas ng iglesia, ang mga tao ay rendered innocent kung yung batas ng dios na natural na naiukit ng dios sa puso ng lahat ng tao, Simula noong bata tayo, kaya alam natin kung ano ang mabuti at masama, ay sinunod mo, kahit wala sayo ang batas ni kristo, na tinuro ng mga apostol, ito para sayo ay batas na pag sinunod mo ay tinuturing ka ng dios na innocent bec youre doer of the law.

“THE DOERS OF THE LAW SHALL BE INNOCENT”

dahil innocent ka e malinis ka kaya natural hinde ka paparusahan kundi bibiyayaan ng kaligtasan.
2SAM22:21 THE LORD REWARDED ME…ACCDG TO THE CLEANNESS OF MY HANDS…

anong reward?
MATT5:8 BLESSED ARE THE CLEAN IN HEART FOR THEY SHALL SEE GOD.

sino yong mga ito?
JOHN9:41 FOR IF YE WERE BLIND YE SHOULD HAVE NO SIN BUT BEC YE SAY THAT YOU SEE THEN YOUR SIN REMAIN.

ang mga spiritually blind e walang kasalanan kahit ano pa ginawa nila na ayon sa blindness nila, at kung mabuti yung puso nila, at umaayon sila sa kabutihan ng puso na sinulat ng dios doon, yung things of the law na nilagay ng dios doon, sabi ng dios maliligtas sila kasi they are considered innocent and sinless
KAHIT PA “OUTSIDE THE LAW” SILA O NASA LABAS NG IGLESIA.

IYAN ANG PATUNAY NA ME KALIGTASAN SA LABAS..
BAKIT?

KASI SABI NG DIOS, SINLESS O WALANG SALA ANG MGA BULAG.
PAPARUSAHAN NIYA BA YONG WALANG SALA?

Logically, hinde po.
ILILIGTAS PO SILA.

2SAM22:21 THE LORD REWARDED ME ACCDFG…TO THE CLEANNESS OF MY HANDS…

SO ANONG IBIG SABIHIN NI HESUS SA SINABI NIYANG TITIPUNIN NIYA LAHAT ANG MGA TUPA, ANG MGA PREDESTINATED AS CHILDREN OF GOD, SA ISANG KAWAN KUNG MERONG TUPA NOON TULAD NG MGA BLIND NA INNOCENT, SA MALAYO NA NAMATAY AT HINDE NAIPASOK SA IGLESIA?

wala naman kasing sinabi si hesus na titipunin niya silang lahat sa panahong buhay sila
Kaya maaari, sa resurrection time, e doon niya tatawagin yong iba, para pumasok sa iglesia, at doon magkaroon ng isang kawan.
Ty.
.
.
#inactive_mcgi

Ang Sulo

ANG PAGKAKAIBA NG NASA LOOB AT NG NASA LABAS NG IGLESIA

Ni Kapatid na Greg F. Nonato- Ministro ng Ebanghelyo

“Maging sa pagkabuhay na mag-uli ay malaki ang pagkakaiba ng kaanib sa Iglesia at ng hindi kaanib.”

PINANINIWALAAN NG MARAMI na ang lahat ng relihiyon ay magkakapareho lamang sa harap ng Diyos. Kaya ang iba ay hindi maselan sa pagpili ng relihiyong inaaaniban. Kung alin ang babagay sa kanilang kursunada at paraan ng pamumuhay ay doon sila umaanib.

Sang-ayon kaya sa pagtuturo ng Biblia ang paniniwalang ang lahat ng relihiyon ay magkakatulad lamang sa harap ng Diyos? Ganito kaya ang itinuro ni Cristo at ng Kaniyang mga apostol? Ayon sa pagtuturo ng Biblia, ganito ang pahayag ni Apostol Pablo:
“Ngayon nga’y wala nang anomang hatol sa mga na kay Cristo Jesus.” (Roma 8:1)
Pansinin na hindi sinabi ni Apostol Pablo na ang lahat ng tao o kahit sino na lamang ay wala nang hatol. Ang tinitiyak ng Biblia na wala nang hatol o hindi na parurusahan ay ang mga na kay Cristo.

Mahalaga, kung gayon, na malaman ng tao kung sino ang tinutukoy ni Apostol Pablo na mga na kay Cristo at dito siya dapat mapabilang upang hindi makasama sa mga parurusahan.

ANG MGA WALA NANG HATOL
Sino ang mga taong na kay Cristo at hindi na hahatulan? Ganito ang mababasa sa Biblia:
“Ay gayon din tayo, na marami, ay iisang katawan kay Cristo, at mga sangkap na samasama sa isa’t isa.” (Roma 12:5)
Ang mga taong kay Cristo ay itinulad sa mga sangkap na sama-sama sa iisang katawan. Ang tinutukoy na katawang kay Cristo ay ang Iglesia Niya:
“At siya ang ulo ng katawan, sa makatuwid baga’y ng iglesia.” (Col. 1:18)
Ang Iglesiang ito na katawan ni Cristo ang tinatawag ng Biblia na Iglesia ni Cristo (Roma 16:16). Kaya, nakatitiyak ang mga kaanib sa Iglesia ni Cristo na maliligtas sila sa hatol o parusa.

Batay sa mga katotohanang ito, maituturing kaya na magkapareho lamang o walang pagkakaiba ang kaanib sa tunay na Iglesia at ang hindi kaanib? Hindi rin kaya hahatulan o parurusahan ang nasa labas nito? Ganito ang nakasulat sa Biblia:
“Datapuwa’t sa nangasa labas ay Dios ang humahatol. Alisin nga ninyo sa inyo ang masamang tao.” (I Cor. 5:13)
Tinitiyak ng Biblia na ang mga nasa labas ay hahatulan o parurusahan ng Diyos. Kaya isang malaking kamalian ang paniniwalang makakapareho lamang na sa Diyos ang lahat ng relihiyon at walang pagkakaiba ang kaanib at hindi kaanib sa Iglesia ni Cristo.

ANG MGA TAGAPAGMANA NG PANGAKO
Pinatutunayan ng Biblia na ang mga kay Cristo ang kinikilalang binhi ni Abraham at mga tagapagmana ng pangako ng Diyos:
“At kung kayo’y kay Cristo, kayo nga’y binhi ni Abraham, at mga tagapagmana ayon sa pangako.” (Gal. 3:29)
Pansining muli na hindi sinasabi sa Biblia na ang lahat ng tao ay mga tagapagmana ng mga pangako. Sa halip, ang mga kay Cristo ang magmamana ng mga pangako. Ano ang pangako na mamanahin ng mga kay Cristo?
“At ito ang pangakong kaniyang ipinangako sa atin, ang buhay na walang hanggan.” (I Juan 2:25)
“Nguni’t, ayon sa kaniyang pangako, ay naghihintay tayo ng bagong langit at ng bagong lupa, na tinatahanan ng katuwiran.” (II Ped. 3:13)
Pinangakuan ang mga kay Cristo ng buhay na walang hanggan. Ang mga kay Cristo rin ang maninirahan sa bagong langit at bagong lupa na tinatahanan ng katuwiran. Kaya, hindi ang lupang ito na ating kasalukuyang tinatahanan ang inaasahan ng mga kay Cristo. Itinuturing nila na sa lupang ito ay manlalakbay lamang sila (Heb. 11:13) at ang tunay nilang bayan ay nasa langit (Filip. 3:20).

Tunay na mapalad ang mga kay Cristo o ang mga sangkap ng Kaniyang katawan o Iglesia.

Pareho lamang ba ang kapalaran ng kaanib at hindi kaanib sa Iglesia? Ang mga hiwalay kay Cristo o hindi sangkap ng Kaniyang katawan o hindi kaanib sa Iglesia ay magmamana rin kaya ng mga pangako ng Diyos? Ganito ang nakasulat sa Biblia:
“Hiwalay kayo noon kay Cristo at hindi kabilang sa Israel. Wala kayong bahagi sa tipan at pangako ng Dios sa kanila. Wala kayong Dios o pag-asa sa kaligtasan.” (Efe 2:12, Salita ng Buhay)
Ang hiwalay kay Cristo ay hindi kabilang sa Israel kung kaya hindi ibinibilang na binhi ni Abraham. Bukod dito, ang hiwalay kay Cristo o wala sa Iglesia ni Cristo ay walang bahagi sa tipan at mga pangako. Wala silang karapatang maglingkod sa Diyos at wala silang pag-asa sa kaligtasan. Kaya hindi totoo na magkapareho lamang at walang pagkakaiba ang kaanib sa Iglesia ni Cristo at ang hindi kaanib. Malaki ang pagkakaiba ng mga taong nasa loob ng Iglesia at ng mga nasa labas.

MAGKAIBA SA PAGKABUHAY NA MULI
Sa muling pagparito ng Panginoong Jesucristo, kapag binuhay nang muli ang mga namatay, pareho lamang ba’t walang pagkakaiba ang kaanib at di kaanib ng Iglesia ni Cristo? Ang sabi sa Biblia:
“Sapagka’t ang Panginoon din ang bababang mula sa langit, na may isang sigaw, may tinig ng arkanghel, at may pakakak ng Dios: at ang nangamatay kay Cristo ay unang mangabubuhay na maguli; Kung magkagayon, tayong nangabubuhay, na nangatitira, ay aagawing kasama nila sa mga alapaap, upang salubungin ang Panginoon sa hangin: at sa ganito’y sasa Panginoon tayo magpakailan man.” (I Tes. 4:16-17)
Ang mga namatay kay Cristo, ayon sa mga apostol, ang unang mabubuhay na muli, at ang mga daratnang buhay ay aagawing kasama nila upang sumalubong sa Panginoon at sila’y sasa Kaniya magpakailan man. Kasama ba sa unang pagkabuhay na mag-uli ng mga patay ang mga hindi kaanib sa Iglesia? Ganito ang nakasulat sa Biblia:
“Ang mga iba sa mga patay ay hindi nangabuhay hanggang sa naganap ang isang libong taon. Ito ang unang pagkabuhay na maguli.”(Apoc. 20:5)
Maging sa pagkabuhay na mag-uli ay malaki ang pagkakaiba ng kaanib sa Iglesia at ng hindi kaanib. Ang mga kay Cristo ang unang mabubuhay na mag-uli samantalang ang hindi kay Cristo ay hindi mangabubuhay hanggang sa maganap ang isang libong taon. Pareho lang kaya na magiging mapalad ang kasama sa unang pagkabuhay na muli at ang bubuhayin makalipas ang isang libong taon? Ganito ang sagot ng Biblia:
“Mapalad at banal ang makalakip sa unang pagkabuhay na maguli: sa mga ito’y walang kapangyarihan ang ikalawang kamatayan; kundi sila’y magiging mga saserdote ng Dios at ni Cristo, at mangaghaharing kasama niya sa loob ng isang libong taon.” (Apoc 20:6)
Ang mapalad ay yaong makakalakip sa unang pagkabuhay na mag-uli sapagkat wala nang kapangyarihan sa kanila ang ikalawang kamatayan o ang kaparusan sa dagat-dagatang apoy (Apoc. 20:14). Ito ay kaayon ng pangako ni Cristo sa Kaniyang Iglesia na ang kapangyarihan ng kamatayan ay hindi mananaig dito (Mateo 16:18).

Sa kabilang dako, magiging mapalad din kaya ang mga hindi kaanib sa Iglesia o ang mga bubuhayin makaraan ang isang libong taon? Ganito ang matutunghayan sa Biblia:
“At kung maganap na ang isang libong taon, si Satanas ay kakalagan sa kaniyang bilangguan. At lalabas upang dumaya sa mga bansa na nasa apat na sulok ng lupa, sa Gog at sa Magog, upang tipunin sila sa pagbabaka: na ang bilang nila ay gaya ng buhangin sa dagat. At nangagsipanhik sila sa kalaparan ng lupa, at kinubkob ang kampamento ng mga banal, at ang bayang iniibig: at bumaba ang apoy mula sa langit, at sila’y nasupok.” (Apoc. 20:7-9)
Ang hindi kasama sa unang pagkabuhay na mag-uli, na ito nga ay ang mga hindi kaanib sa Iglesia, ay sawimpalad sapagkat nakasulat sa Biblia na bagaman sila ay bubuhayin, ang apoy ay bababa mula sa langit upang sila ay supukin.

Mga mahal naming mababasa, huwag natin itong ipagwalang-bahala. Alisin natin sa ating isipan ang maling paniniwala na ang lahat ng relihiyon ay magkakapareho lamang sa harap ngh Diyos. Pawiin natin sa ating isipan ang paniniwala na walang pagkakaiba ang nasa loob at ang nasa labas ng tunay na Iglesiang kay Cristo. Gaya ng ating tinalakay, napakalaki ng pagkakaiba ng mga kay Cristo o kaanib sa kaniyang Iglesia kaysa hindi kaanib o hindi kay Cristo. Ang maging kay Cristo ay katumbas ng pagiging ligtas sa hatol sa Araw ng Paghuhukom. Ang pagiging kay Cristo ay katumbas ng pagmamana ng mga pangako ng Diyos. Ang maging kay Cristo ay katumbas ng unang pagkabuhay na muli at paghaharing kasama ni Cristo sa Kaniyang pagparito.

Link Source : http://inc-ako.blogspot.com/2011/09/ang-pagkakaiba-ng-nasa-loob-at-ng-nasa_26.html?m=1





No photos in free mode

Use Data to See Photos

March 28 at 9:25am · Public

Boost this post for ₱51 to reach up to 1,700 people.

6 People Reached · Boost Post

Save


Write a comment…

Attach a Photo · Mention Friends

THE EVIL OF EDUARDO MANALO AND THE IGLESIA NI CRISTO CULT REGARDING 36TS

.This analysis is based on the INC statement justifying their inhumane and unchristian act of expelling Manalos relatives from their housing compound. Before that, let us consider how INC have love people by giving them charitable services and help such as free housing for the poor.

THEY LOVE THEIR FELLOW MAN AS THEYMANIFEST.

In Tagalog,

“Tunay na tunay”

HERE IS THERE STATEMENT:

(In full)
INC releases official statement: INC to file ejectment case against expelled members
Iglesia Ni Cristo Press Statement

January 14, 2016
Ang Pamamahala ng Iglesia Ni Cristo (INC) sa pangunguna ng aming Executive Minister, ang Kapatid na Eduardo V. Manalo, ay nagpasiya nang magsampa ng ejectment case sa hukuman laban sa mga dating kaanib nito na sina G. Angel Manalo at Gng. Lottie Hemedez at mga kasama na hanggang ngayon ay hindi pa rin umaalis sa housing compound ng Iglesia sa #36 Tandang Sora Avenue.
Nais naming bigyang-diin na ang buong compound sa #36 Tandang Sora ay pagmamay-ari ng Iglesia Ni Cristo. Subalit ang karapatang ito ng Iglesia ay hindi na iginagalang kundi niyuyurakan pa ng kampo nina G. Angel at Gng. Lottie.
Sapul nang sila’y itiniwalag noong July 23, 2015—kasamang nawala sa kanila ang pribilehiyo na makapanuluyan sa pabahay ng Iglesia. Gayunman alang-alang sa simulaing Cristiano at para sa humanitarian considerations, hindi namin sila agad pinaalis doon.
Bilang nakikipanuluyan sa loob ng bakuran na pagmamay-ari ng INC, gumawa pa sila ng mga bagay na isinasapanganib ang seguridad ng naturang INC compound at ang ibang naninirahan malapit doon.
Sa katunayan, namataan sa CCTV na sila’y nagpapapasok ng mga kahina-hinalang kalalakihan. Nakatakip ang mukha kahit dis-oras ng gabi. May bitbit na malalaking bag na sila lang ang nakakaalam kung ano talaga ang laman. Patuloy na namamalagi sa loob ng compound ang mga lalaking minsan may hawak na camera at may bitbit na kung ano sa kanilang mga bag. Tinatanong namin ang publiko—kung ganito ang ginagawa sa inyong bakuran: papayagan ba ninyo na mamalagi ang mga ito na wala kayong ginagawang legal na aksiyon?
Dahil dito, nagsampa ang INC ng injunction case sa korte laban sa kanila noong Setyembre 21, 2015. Naintindihan ng hukuman ang pangangailangan ng seguridad kaya sila mismo ang nag-atas na maglagay ng security ang INC doon for monitoring purposes (September 29, 2015). Sa maraming ulit ay hiniling at ipinakiusap na ibigay nila ang mga pangalan ng mga naroroon. Hanggang nitong huli ay ipinag-utos na ng hukuman sa panig nila G. Angel at Gng. Lottie na magbigay ng listahan ng mga pangalan ng lahat ng kasama nila sa compound. Pero hanggang ngayon hindi nila sinusunod ang court order na ito. Mahigit na tatlong buwan na pong naninirahan sa tabi ng Central Office ang mga kahina-hinalang tao na iyan na hanggang ngayon ay hindi nila pinapangalanan. Hindi lamang sila ang naninirahan at nanunuluyan sa Central Compound—wala bang karapatan ang mga otorisadong naninirahan doon sa kanilang kapanatagan at seguridad (freedom from fear and right to security)?
Isang gabi noong Nobyembre 2015, may isang lalaki ang inilabas ni G. Angel at mga kasama na nalaman na lamang po namin na patay na kinaumagahan. Hanggang ngayon ay malabo pa rin kung ano po nangyari. At ang sisi ay gusto pa nilang ibaling sa Iglesia.
Noong Disyembre 2015, pagkatapos na matuloy ang inspeksiyon ng sheriff batay sa court order, ayaw nilang patingnan ang kabuuan ng lugar at ipinipilit na iyong isang gusali lamang sa bukana ang pwedeng tingnan sa ocular inspection. Sinabi nila na hindi bahagi ng #36 Tandang Sora ang ibang mga gusali at bahay ng dalawang (2) hektaryang compound at inamin na sa Iglesia iyon. Dahil dito, inusog na ang mga temporaryong bakod na yero upang maproteksiyonan ang mas malaking bahagi ng compound ng Iglesia. Dito na rin nabawi ang 39 na sasakyan na pag-aari ng Iglesia na kanilang itinatago ng matagal na panahon. Mayroon pang hinahanap na mahigit na 20 pang sasakyan na nakapangalan sa Iglesia.
Ayaw nilang magbayad ng konsumo nila sa kuryente at gusto pa nilang ang Iglesia pa rin ang magbayad nito para sa kanila. Ang totoo, for humanitarian considerations, hanggang ngayon ang Iglesia pa rin ang nagbabayad ng kanilang konsumo sa tubig.
Nitong mga nakaraang araw, ang mga kasamahan nila sa loob ay inaaway, sinasaktan, pinagsasalitaan ng masama at minumura ang mga security guards sa compound ng Iglesia.
Lahat ng mga ito ay nakapagdulot ng pagka-alarma sa mga kapatid sa Iglesia. Lalong nakararami sa mga kapatid ay nakadarama ng pangamba para sa seguridad hindi lamang ng Central Office ng Iglesia kundi lalo na sa buhay ng aming pinakamamahal na Tagapamahalang Pangkalahatan—ang Kapatid na Eduardo V. Manalo.
Sa harap ng lahat ng pangyayaring ito, kayo na mga nakamasid sa amin, kayo na rin ang makapagpapasiya. Tama bang akusahan ng paglabag sa karapatang pantao ang liderato ng Iglesia ni Cristo?
Sa kabila nito, hindi lamang sila patuloy na gumagawa ng malisyosong paninira kundi nagpa-file ng kung anu-anong kaso.
Sukdulan na ang kanilang mga paninira at pagsisinungaling sa media sa layuning siraan ang Iglesia lalo na ang kasalukuyang Pamamahala. Kaya ngayon gagawin na ng Iglesia ang hakbang na marapat alinsunod sa itinatadhana ng batas

***TAKEN FROM  THE IGLESIA NI CRISTO PAGE***

 

ASSESSMENT:
THE REASON OF THE EXPULSION:

1. Dahil daw tiwalag sila wala daw silang pribilehiyo sa pabahay ng iglesia…

2. Nilagay daw nila sa panganib ang seguridad ng INC compound na yon at ang mga taong naninirahan sa malapit tulad ng pagpapasok ng mga tao sa alanganing oras may bitbit  na kamera etc at nanirahan doon ng tatlong buwan.

3. Hindi daw sila sumunod sa korte na pangalanan lahat ng kasama nila sa compound.

4. May pinatuloy sila na kinaumagahan e namatay…

5. Sa ocular inspection ayon sa court order e hinde nila pina-inspect yong ibang parte ng compound.
6. Itinago nila ang 39 sasakyan ng iglesia.

7. Ayaw nilang magbayad ng water and electric fees.

8. Inaaway, sinasaktan at minumura ang mga securityy guards.

9. NAAALARMA ANG INC SA SEGURIDAD NI EDUARDOl MANALO DAHIL DITO.

10. Sinisiraan daw nila ang iglesia at kinakasuhan ng kung ano.

IYAN ANG SIDE NG INC. Maaaring totoo, maaaring hinde. Let us put into consideration how their actions were before, how they treat enemies such as eli soriano. They used deception such as splicing videos of Eli to paint him negatively. They aired audio version  of Elis program, maliciously cut to anger Muslims. They called for terrorists to track Eli. They threatened to kill him by calling for the services of amurao, a memorial service. Not excluding the NBIs harassment wherein possibly INC has influence, as one of their lawyer-member was a participant.

HAVING THAT, DO YOU THINK THEY ARE TELLING THE TRUTH? THEY WERE GUILTY of deception, lying and malice. They are an evil breed as a church. But let us note, how INC love their fellow man, tunay na tunay.

BIBLICAL JUDGMENTS ON THEIR ACTIONS AGAINST ANGEL AND TENNY:

How do christians behave towards excommunicated members ?
Let us say INC is the true church, in that aspect, this is the consequences:

HEB 6:4-8 FOR IT IS IMPOSSIBLE  FOR THOSE WHO WERE ONCE ENLIGHTENED…TO RENEW THEM TO REPENTANCE IF THEY SHALL FALL AWAY…THAT WHICH BEAR THORNS IS REJECTED AND NEAR  UNTO CURSING WHOSE END IS TO BE BURNED…

Nevertheless, no-one knows who were enlightened then fall away.

HOW COME?
We cannot judge who are guilty or innocent in the eyes of god, thus after, they are excommunicated, we cannot Judge them as evil or good.

1COR5:13YOU JUDGE THEM THAT ARE WITHIN BUT OUTSIDE THE CHURCH GOD JUDGE…

Why cannot we judge who are evil or good in the eyes of god?

BEC WE CANNOT READ THE HEART.

ONLY GOD CAN.

2CHRO 6:30 ONLY YOU (god) KNOWS THE HEART OF MEN

There is possibility that these people such as tenny or angel are merely blind thus to god they are sinless.

BLIND PEOPLE ARE SINLESS TO GOD.

JOHN 9:31 IF YE WERE BLIND YE SHOULD HAVE NO SIN BUT NOW YE SAY THAT YOU SEE, THEN YOUR SIN REMAIN.

BLINDNESS HAPPENS IN THE HEART. It is blindness of the truth of god.

EPH1:7-8 THE FATHER OF GLORY  MAY GIVE UNTO YOU THE SPIRIT OF WISDOM AND REVELATION IN THE KNOWLEDGE OF HIM, THE EYES OF YOUR HEART BEING ENLIGHTENED…

ONLY GOD CAN SEE THE HEART. THUS ONLY HIM KNOWS WHO ARE INNOCENT OR NOT. How could they, angel and tenny, be blind? Possibly, bec they have no knowledge  of the truth bec they have different understanding.

THUS THERE IS POSSIBILITY THAT THEY ARE SINLESS TO GOD. HAVING THAT POSSIBILITY, WOULD YOU REFRAIN LOVING THEM, AS THEY COULD BE BROTHERS OF JESUS?

MATT 25:34-40 come ye  blessed of my father, inherit the kingdom…FOR I WAS HUNGRY  AND YOU FEED ME…I WAS A STRANGER AND  YOU TOOK ME IN…IN AS MUCH AS YOU HAVE DONE IT TO ONE OF THE LEAST  OF MY  BROTHERS YOU HAVE DONE IT TO ME.

BEC we cannot read hearts to know who are blind or not, BROTHERS of Jesus or not, we must love everyone. THAT IS THE ESSENCE OF LOVING ENEMIES AS JESUS TAUGHT. WHY DONT YOU LOVE  YOUR ENEMIES, INC? There is a provision of god though when the church would refrain from helping people.

2CHRO19:2 SHOULD YOU HELP THE UNGODLY AND LOVE THEM THAT HATES THE LORD, THEREFORE WRATH IS BEFORE YOU FROM BEFORE THE LORD….

When you can prove, that angel and tenny hates God, then don’t love and help them as indicated by context but the mere fact that you admits of helping them for humanitarian reasons then it proves, this verse is invalid.
NOT ALL BLIND PEOPLE ARE SINLESS TO GOD, BEC BLIND LEADERS ARE CONDEMNED TO HELL–those that leads others to hell.

MATT 23:16,15 WOE UNTO YOU BLIND GUIDES…FOR YE COMPASS SEA AND LAND TO MAKE ONE PROSELYTE AND WHEN HE IS MADE, YE MAKE HIM TWOFOLD THE CHILD OF HELL THAN YOURSELVES…HOW CAN YE ESCAPE THE DAMNATION OF HELL?

BLIND teachers as described are condemned. Are angel and tenny, blind teachers leading the blind to hell? Jesus said those to the specific people bec he read their hearts. Paul likewise judged a person bec of the guidance of the holy ghost.

ACTS13:9-10 PAUL FILLED WITH THE HOLY GHOST SAID O FULL OF SUBTILTY AND ALL MISCHIEF THOU CHILD OF THE DEVIL, THOU ENEMY OF ALL RIGHTEOUSNESS, WILL THOU NOT CEASE TO PERVERT THE RIGHT WAYS OF THE LORD?

Is there possibility that your judgment was by the guidance of the holy ghost? DID THE HOLY GHOST TELL YOU THAT THEY ARE BLIND LEADERS LEADING THE BLIND TO HELL? If so, your reasons must not exceed the law of christ.

1COR3:6 EXCEED NOT WHAT IS WRITTEN..

1COR9:20-21 TO THE JEW I BECOME AS A JEW…BUT UNDER THE LAW OF CHRIST.

Nowhere in the scriptures can you show that angel and tenny are BLIND LEADERS leading people to hell. There is no MORTAL sins they teach by their heresy. STILL, NOWHERE DID GOD SAID NOT TO LOVE BLIND LEADERS, OR NOT TO HELP THEM, instead, to have compassion.

ACTS20:35 HOW THAT SO LABORING YE OUGHT TO SUPPORT THE WEAK AND TO REMEMBER JESUS WORDS, IT IS MORE BLESSED TO GIVE THAN TO RECEIVE.

LABORING magtrabaho daw, ano nga pala trabaho ni manalo?
The mere fact, that they could simply be blind without leading people to hell, Why refrain love or help for them when they could be the least of Jesus brothers?

MATT 25: 41-45 DEPART FROM ME YE CURSED INTO EVERLASTING FIRE…FOR I WAS HUNGRY AND YOU DID NOT FEED ME…A STRANGER AND YOU TOOK ME NOT IN…IN AS MUCH AS YE DID NOT DO TO THE LEAST OF MY BROTHERS YE DID IT NOT TO ME…

the mere fact, that tenny and angel could be least of the brothers of Jesus, you have done a grave offense to god by not feeding and giving them shelter. You should have love them considering that they could be blind or sinless and could have been the least of Jesus brothers.

JOHN 9:41 IF YE WERE BLIND YE SHOULD HAVE NO SIN…

THEY COULD BE ASTRAY SHEEP FROM THE FOLD WHICH JESUS WENT TO LOOK FOR:

LUKE15:4-7

or at least love them as family members.
LET US NOTE THOUGH THAT YOU LOVE YOUR FELLOW MAN VERY MUCH

TUNAY NA TUNAY…

(Unless though you could prove that they could provide for themselves in that instance of expulsion….then, I believe your acts are not justified, IF NOT, YOU SHOULD LOVE YOUR ENEMIES

FEED THEM

GIVE THEM TO DRINK

AS NECESSARY

so as God said…

BUT THEN, WHERE IS THE LOVE?

They are your family, manalo, for gods sake!)
lastly,

GEN 4:9 AND THE LORD SAID UNTO CAIN, WHERE IS YOUR BROTHER ABEL? HE SAID, I DONT KNOW, AM I MY BROTHERs KEEPER?

EDUARDO MANALO, ARE YOU YOUR BROTHERS KEEPER?
Let us note though that INC love their fellow man as evident by their charitable help to the poor…

Tunay na tunay…

.

.

#inactive_mcgi