The topic was about Amos 8:11-12 famine of God’s words that led to the death of the physical church of God before then restored as MCGI. My defense was Amos 8:11-12 is a random narrative inserted in the chapter. Random narrative means an out of context insertion or an out from the sequence of events, an out of order narrative. I tried to prove it by showing God’s typical way of using random narrative in the bible which Benfrancis indirectly though unaware admitted to be true. After apparently realizing his blunder was irked and loses temper threatening to ban me from the group that has re-accepted me back after they kicked me out by reason of my strong apologetics.
Here is the biblical random narrative example:
And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.
And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof.
As you can see, this is not a succession of event bec it is a random order of event. Being random order of events, then it is a random narrative akin to Amos 8:11-12 being an out of order event from the surrounding verses that particularly happens in reference to the death of the church. As you can see, the reality of random narrative is biblical, justifying our belief of Amos 8:11-12 as an out of order narrative or a random narrative. These catholics failed to refute but resorted to temperamental accusation of lying, hurled to my person.
Here is an excerpt to the temperamental dialogue:
Did he kick me out? Who cares? Your strictness is irrational and rigid.
For those who cannot get why I said he indirectly admitted in favor of my random narrative concept, I’ll show you. He said: (paraphrase)
“The baptism of Jesus mentioned in the present happening is a thing in the past.”
How could a thing in the past be among the present happening if its not an out of order insertion? Being an inserted, out of order narrative with regards to the present happening logically qualifies it as random narrative and by conforming to it as an out of order narrative, he admitted it indirectly as a random narrative complementing my concept he wanted to destroy. Realizing that apparently, he got angry.
He seem to be ignorant regarding indirect admission.
Note: the name of the group is CATHOLIC TRUTH EXPLAINED WITH CHARITY
Explanation for random narrative: