WHICH IS BETTER: JUDAISM OR ISLAM?

Below is the comparison. Check out how Islam is lagging behind in tremendous gap, how much so if compared to the morally superior Christianity.

  • KILLING PEOPLE. 

Judaism: Records show god consenting the killing of all sort of people young and old alike as such was in the Jericho case. Therefore God ordered the killing of children.

ISLAM: ALLAH CONSENTED FOR MUHAMMAD TO DISOBEY HIM AND DO THINGS OUTSIDE ALLAH’S REVELATION SUCH AS ASSIGNING A JEW TO JUDGE ENEMIES WITH DEATH PENALTY: THE BANU QURAISHA TRIBE, WHICH ALLAH NEVER ORDERED SHOULD BE. IT CONTRADICTED ALLAH’S SANCTION FOR MUHAMMAD TO ABIDE BY THE REVELATION.

ALLAH CONSENTED MUHAMMAD TO KILL BANU QURAISHA 10-13YEAR OLDS HAVING PUBIC HAIRS SOME HAVING NO UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT IS RIGHT OR WRONG AS POSSIBLY, SOME HAVE THEIR MINDSET THAT OF AN 10 OR 8 YEAR OLDS, AS ATTESTED BY SCIENCE. THAT IS TANTAMOUNT TO KILLING INNOCENT PEOPLE, BEC THEY DONT KNOW RIGHT OR WRONG. INNOCENT IN LIKE MANNER AS BABIES. 

MUHAMMAD PRESUMED WHO ARE GUILTY OF DEATH THROUGH THE PRESENCE OF PUBIC HAIRS EVEN WITHOUT ALLAH’S SANCTION AS COMPULSORY GUIDE THEREFORE ISLAM ALLOWS KILLING PEOPLE BY PRESUMPTION OF GUILT OF ANYONE WITH PUBIC HAIR, AS SOME OF THESE ARE MENTALLY BEHIND TO KNOW RIGHT OR WRONG. 13YEAR OLDS HAVING A MENTAL AGE OF 7-9 SO AS SCIENCE ATTESTS. THEREFORE, MUHAMMAD KILLED INNOCENT BANU QURAISHA BOYS.

LIKEWISE, SIMPLE INSULT AGAINST MUHAMMAD MERITS DEATH PENALTY.

Commentary: If Judaism has allowed killing of innocent people young or old and Islam killed innocent people by presuming guilt through pubic hair. It looks that in this case Judaism and Islam is at par–they both kill innocent people. But adding the death penalty for insulters, a shallow offense, Judaism is better off as it tolerates insult.

  • KILLING CAPTIVES

Judaism: All male captives would be killed.

ISLAM: MUHAMMAD MASSACRED ALL MALE BANU QURAISHA CAPTIVES. 

Commentary: No difference.

  • SLAVERY AND MARRYING SLAVES

Judaism:  It is prohibitted to FORCE war captives as slaves or as wives.

ISLAM: It forces war captives to be slaves. It is compulsory.

Commentary: Who wants to be subjected to force labor against freewill? Its oppressive to be forced as a slave.

  • DEATH PENALTY

Judaism: Death is for harlots, worshippers of other gods, murderers etc….It don’t kill non virgins unless they are harlots.

ISLAM: Death is for murderers, insulter of Islam, propagator of anti-islam news, etc…

Commentary: God is cleansing evil by force through preserving respect to Judaism God. It is by killing those who worship other gods. Islam tolerates its Muslims even if they do shirk. Therefore, Judaism is more concerned of saving souls through death threat while Islam doesn’t care. Shockingly, Islam kills insulters. It is logically, shallow offense. 

  • PRISONERS OF WAR

Judaism: It is prohibited to oppress prisoners but to treat them as one treat himself by the principle “love strangers as thyself”. They respect their right to decide. They don’t force them to be slaves.

ISLAM: IT FORCES WOMEN CAPTIVES TO BE SLAVES.

Conclusion

As you can see, the two religion is similar and equally viable in terms of killing innocent people, captives and enemies. Both religion kills innocent persons. Judaism killed innocent people by direct divine sanction. Islam kills innocent people by presumption of guilt. Babies or adult, is both alike– An innocent persons. Age is just the difference but in terms of innocence, baby or pubescent boy, is alike. Therefore when it comes to killing, judaism and islam are alike. Both kills innocent people. Having an age clause for those to be killed doesn’t make islam less violent bec baby or not, are both innocent. No distinction. Both are innocent.  Islam though outnumbered Judaism in terms of violent and oppressive activities. Islam kills insulters, a shallow offense, even, propagators of false news. Insult is shallow, but islam preferred to be inconsiderate of free speech and right of religious expression such as insults. Judaism don’t kill insulters as its a shallow offense, tolerable. Islam forces captives to be slaves. Judaism respect any captive’s decision. It don’t force anyone to be slaves. Therefore Islam is more oppressive by forcing people into force labor against freewill, depriving them liberty. Islam don’t kill worshippers of Jesus as scholars tried to say, as they don’t kill apostates unless, they speak falsely against islam or if they are allies of oppressors. Therefore, Islam is less concern if a Muslim apostates or not. Judaism killed worshippers of other gods, forcing them to submit and later to learn how to love god. A concerned religion. Islam is not concerned. Islam forgives penitent shirk. It has no physical threat though to prevent shirk, but hell. (Christians on the other hand, excommunicates these kind, as during Christianity, these are hellbound. Hell as a threat for Christians to avoid worshipping false gods. ) Islam bec it is lenient for shirk, as it forgives penitent shirk, opens a wider opening for shirk bec of the possibility of forgiveness in case you are penitent. Judaism, bec of death threat narrowed the possibility of shirk than Islam.

Now, having these, which is better? Which is more considerate? Or more oppressive? Or more concern?

Analyze!

Lastly, note how I avoided supplying supporting verses. I intended this for the intellectual and learned Muslims, scholars or imams who knew what I’m talking about or has the high capacity to validate. Everything I said about Judaism is a biblical fact. 

Nevertheless, I should provide proofs how judaism treated strangers: prisoners or not for credibility, as it say,

Leviticus 19:34

[34]But the stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God.

Exodus 22:21

[21]Thou shalt neither vex a stranger, nor oppress him: for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt.

Judaism don’t force non-jews in Israel, prisoners or not to be as slaves or as wives as judaism respect the captive’s rights to decide as it say,

Deuteronomy 24:17

[17]Thou shalt not pervert (or morally deflect) the judgment (or decision) of the stranger (prisoner or not)  nor of the fatherless; nor take a widow’s raiment to pledge:

As you can see, judaism is morally superior than islam in these aspects! If you intend to refute me, contact me through my FB in the information board in the menu above.
Shalom!

P.S READ BELOW ⬇ HOW MUHAMMAD KILLED INNOCENT BOYS: 


    Peace!

    Advertisements

    Leave a Reply

    Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

    WordPress.com Logo

    You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

    Twitter picture

    You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

    Facebook photo

    You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

    Google+ photo

    You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

    Connecting to %s