ALLAH KILLED MUHAMMAD BEC OF BANU QURAISHA

Allah said to kill Muhammad if he resorted to inventing revelations.

it is the speech of a noble Messenger. It is not the speech of a poet (little do you believe) nor the speech of a soothsayer (little do you remember). A sending down from the Lord of all Being. Had he invented against Us any sayings, We would have seized him by the right hand, then We would surely have cut his life-vein. S. 69:40-46 Arberry



Muhammad was commanded to practice ONLY what is revealed.

And when Our signs are recited to them, clear signs, those who look not to encounter Us say, ‘Bring a Koran other than this, or alter it.’ Say: ‘It is not for me to alter it of my own accord. I follow nothing, except what is revealed to me. Truly I fear, if I should rebel against my Lord, the chastisement of a dreadful day.’ S. 10:15 Arberry

Muhammad massacred a tribe according to the judgment of a Jew.

 thus the apostle said: Will you be satisfied, o Aus, if one of your own number pronounces judgement on them? When they agreed he said that Sa’d b. Mu’adh was the man…Sa’d said, Then I give judgement that the men should be killed, the property divide, and the women and children taken as captives. (Ibid,. pp. 464)

Therefore Muhammad killed them.

Including teens with pubic hairs as guilty of death and spared those without pubic hair as innocent.

Sunan an-Nasa’i:

It was narrated that Kathir bin As-Sa’ib said: “The sons of Quraizah told me that they were presented to the Messenger of Allah on the Day of Quraizah, and whoever (among them) had reached puberty, or had grown pubic hair, was killed, and whoever had not reached puberty and had not grown pubic hair was left (alive).” (Sunan an-Nasa’i Volume 4, Book 27, Hadith 3459).

The question is, allah did not abrogate it, should it be Islamic custom, muhammad being the pattern of conduct to do things by mere guess who are guilty or innocent  even without allah’s order, but as imitation of that sunnah to kill through presumption of guilt even without allah’s permission. It must be Islamic custom!

Apparently, muhammad’s action was by unrecited revelation. Revelation which were not included in the Quran as Muslims say.

The Qibla was also an unrecited revelation. It was not detailed in Quran yet Muslims practiced it.

A Muslim site say:

e: The Holy Qur’ân says:

 

And We did not appoint the Qiblah on which you were earlier, but that We might know the people who follow the Messenger as distinct from those who turn back on their heels. (2:143)

 

In order to understand the verse, it is necessary to know the background in which it was revealed:

In the early days of Madani life, after the Holy Prophet’s migration to Madinah, the Muslims were ordered to direct their faces in prayers towards Baytul-Maqdas (Jerusalem) which had been appointed as Qiblah of the Muslims. Up to seventeen months, the Muslims had been observing the Baytul-Maqdas as their Qiblah. It was after seventeen months that the Holy Qur’ân abrogated the earlier order and the Muslims were required to observe the Holy Mosque of Makkah as their Qiblah and turn their faces towards it while praying. The following verse was revealed to appoint the new Qiblah:

 

.So turn your face towards al-Masjid al-Haraam. (2:144)

This new order was criticized by some disbelievers and they objected on it as to why the Baytul-Maqdas was appointed as Qiblah earlier. The above quoted verse (2:143) was revealed to answer this objection. The answer was that the appointment of the former Qiblah was in order to test the people whether or not they follow the Messenger. To quote the meaning of the verse again:

And We did not appoint the Qiblah on which you were earlier, but that We might know the people who follow the Messenger. (2:143)

Here the appointment of the previous Qiblah has been attributed to Allâh Almighty, which is a clear indication to the fact that the appointment of Baytul-Maqdas as Qiblah was done by the order of Allâh Almighty Himself. But this order is nowhere in the Holy Qur’ân, and there is no verse in the Holy Book which directs the turning of faces towards Baytul-Maqdas. This order was given to Muslims by the Holy Prophet ( ) with no reference to any verse of the Holy Qur’ân. Still, this order was mentioned by the Holy Qur’ân in the above quoted verse as the order of Allâh: The words,

“We did not appoint the Qiblah,” instead of the words,

“The Holy Prophet did not.” are too clear on this point to need more explanation.

This statement of the Holy Qur’ân, thus, evidently proves that the previous order given by the Holy Prophet was based on a revelation which did not form part of the Book. And this is exactly the “unrecited revelation.” 

🔺

As you can see, there are acts of muhammad absent from quran which are allegedly “unrecited revelations” which are obligatory for muslims to do such as the Qibla or the praying direction wherein Muslims face.
Therefore, Muhammad’s action, killing all captives by a non Muslim verdict and killing teens with pubic hair is apparently by unrecited revelation. And bec it is an action that is a pattern of conduct for muslims, as muhammad is the model, it must have been written in the Quran. Quran being the complete book of truth and universal laws.

Bec this action of muhammad is absent in the quran suggest it as his personal decision. Allah did not order him bec if he did, this order should have been in the complete book of truth and universal laws, the quran!

Bec it was not in the quran, to kill all captives including teens by a non muslim verdict therefore, Muhammad has did something Allah did not permits, which makes muhammad a transgressor of the law, and an evil doer.

How come?

He followed something that is not in quran or something allah did not reveal.

And when Our signs are recited to them, clear signs, those who look not to encounter Us say, ‘Bring a Koran other than this, or alter it.’ Say: ‘It is not for me to alter it of my own accord. I follow nothing, except what is revealed to me. Truly I fear, if I should rebel against my Lord, the chastisement of a dreadful day.’ S. 10:15 Arberry



Though, there are times when allah corrected him when he did things that allah did not reveal, those were minor offenses, whereas killing without Allah’s approval or consent is a major sin which allah said, if muhammad made any saying (unauthorized law, to be followed) other than what is revealed allah would kill him if its weight is a major sin, as implied,

.Had he invented against Us any sayings (unauthorized law) We would have seized him by the right hand, then We would surely have cut his life-vein. S. 69:40-46 Arberry

‘Bring a Koran other than this, or alter it.’ Say: ‘It is not for me to alter it of my own accord. I follow nothing, except what is revealed to me. Truly I fear, if I should rebel against my Lord, the chastisement of a dreadful day.’ S. 10:15 Arberry


Thus when muhammad died of poison. It was allah who killed him just as he warned. Bec muhammad was an evil person! A murderer! Lawless! Bloody evil ruler! Who did murder, a major sin, which Allah did not allow.

A pattern of good conduct?

10 thoughts on “ALLAH KILLED MUHAMMAD BEC OF BANU QURAISHA

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s