REFUTING MUHAMMAD’S ‘UNRECITED REVELATION’ JUSTIFYING HIS MASSACRE OF JEWS 🌙

In my first post, I have explicitly shown the massacre of banu quraisha by Muhammad as murder and unlawful as it was not Qur’anic. There is nothing in Quran that justifies killing captives by virtue of the Torah and by conforming to a non-muslim’s verdict as basis for the massacre. As I reiterated, Quran is complete and fully detailed thus all Islamic sanctions must be by the Quran. Nothing in it suggests killing of captives by virtue of saad’s verdict and by the Torah.

Quran being the complete truth, therefore, impose the reality that all of muhammad’s action must at least have quranic basis, which the massacre of banu quraisha is traceless from it.

Nevertheless, muslims have defended it by bringing out the reality of “unrecited revelations” which they seem to say, justifies muhammad’s actions such as the massacre of banu quraisha, which are absent from any quranic ruling.

What are “unrecited revelations”?

These are revelations absent from the Qur’an during when it was not yet completed.

I want to refute that. I want to refute that Muhammad’s massacre of banu quraisha is justified.

I WILL PROVE BY SIMPLE LOGIC AND CONTEXT THAT INDEED MUHAMMAD WAS A MURDERER AND ALLAH A LIAR AS I PREVIOUSLY CLAIMED.

Firstly, I want to reinforce Islamic teaching. Indeed, there are two kinds of revelation given to muhammad, the recitation (the quran) and the “unrecited revelation”.

 

 


 

 

57:9 it is he who sends down the revelations (unrecited revelation and the quran)  to his slave (Muhammad) that he may bring you out from darkness to light.

 


 

A. THE QURAN AS THE FIRST KIND OF REVELATION!🌙

💀


“Ye without doubt, sent down the Message (quran) and We will certainly guard it (from corruption).”Qur’an 15:09


 

Quran 6:19] Say, “Whose testimony is the greatest?” Say, “God’s. He is the witness between me and you that this Quran has been inspired to me, to preach it to you and whomever it reaches. Indeed, you bear witness that there are other gods beside God.” Say, “I do not testify as you do; there is only one god, and I disown your idolatry.”

[Quran 6:38] We did not leave anything out of this book.

[Quran 7:52] We have given them a scripture that is fully detailed, with knowledge, guidance, and mercy for the people who believe.

[Quran 10:37] This Quran could not possibly be authored by other than God. It confirms all previous messages, and provides a fully detailed scripture. It is infallible, for it comes from the Lord of the universe.

[Quran 12:111] In their history, there is a lesson for those who possess intelligence. This is not fabricated Hadith; this (Quran) confirms all previous scriptures, provides the details of everything, and is a beacon and mercy for those who believe.

Quran 6:114] Shall I seek other than God as a source of law, when He has revealed to you this book fully detailed? Those who received the scripture recognize that it has been revealed from your Lord, truthfully. You shall not harbor any doubt. 

[Quran 6:115] The word of your Lord is complete, in truth and justice. Nothing shall abrogate His words. He is the Hearer, the Omniscient.


Qur’an is “a guidance for mankind… and the distinction (between right and wrong).”Qur’an 2:185

Verily, We have sent down to you (O Muhammad) the Book for mankind in truth. So whosoever accepts the guidance, it is only for his own self; and whosoever goes astray, he goes astray only for his own loss.” Qur’an 39:41

🌙

CONCLUSION: QURAN IS COMPLETE IN TRUTH, FULLY DETAILED, A GUIDANCE AND CRITERION TO KNOW RIGHT FROM WRONG, AND LASTLY, IT HAS EVERYTHING AS BEACON AND MERCY FOR BELIEVERS AND BY SAYING,

“We did not leave anything out of this book.”

IT MEANS, THERE IS NO UNIVERSAL RELIGIOUS TRUTH OUTSIDE QURAN THAT IS NEEDED, AS EVERYTHING IS IN IT, NOTHING IS LEFT OUTSIDE IT, THUS, QURAN IS THE ONLY SOURCE OF RELIGIOUS MATERIAL, OR THE BASIS OF RELIGIOUS TRUTH, OR THE BASIS FOR CLARIFICATION SUCH AS BY THE HADITHS.

B. THE “UNRECITED REVELATIONS” OR REVELATIONS ABSENT IN THE QURAN!🌙

A Muslim site explains:

This second kind of revelation is not contained in the Holy Qur’ân, but the Holy Qur’ân itself not only refers to it frequently but attributes its contents to Allâh Almighty. Some verses of the Holy Book are reproduced below which clearly prove that the “revelation” is not confined to the Holy Qur’ân, but there is another kind of “wahy” which does not form part of the “Holy Book,” yet it is the revelation from Allâh Almighty:

First Example: The Holy Qur’ân says:

 

And We did not appoint the Qiblah on which you were earlier, but that We might know the people who follow the Messenger as distinct from those who turn back on their heels. (2:143)

 

In order to understand the verse, it is necessary to know the background in which it was revealed:

In the early days of Madani life, after the Holy Prophet’s migration to Madinah, the Muslims were ordered to direct their faces in prayers towards Baytul-Maqdas (Jerusalem) which had been appointed as Qiblah of the Muslims. Up to seventeen months, the Muslims had been observing the Baytul-Maqdas as their Qiblah. It was after seventeen months that the Holy Qur’ân abrogated the earlier order and the Muslims were required to observe the Holy Mosque of Makkah as their Qiblah and turn their faces towards it while praying. The following verse was revealed to appoint the new Qiblah:

 

.So turn your face towards al-Masjid al-Haraam. (2:144)

This new order was criticized by some disbelievers and they objected on it as to why the Baytul-Maqdas was appointed as Qiblah earlier. The above quoted verse (2:143) was revealed to answer this objection. The answer was that the appointment of the former Qiblah was in order to test the people whether or not they follow the Messenger. To quote the meaning of the verse again:

And We did not appoint the Qiblah on which you were earlier, but that We might know the people who follow the Messenger. (2:143)

Here the appointment of the previous Qiblah has been attributed to Allâh Almighty, which is a clear indication to the fact that the appointment of Baytul-Maqdas as Qiblah was done by the order of Allâh Almighty Himself. But this order is nowhere in the Holy Qur’ân, and there is no verse in the Holy Book which directs the turning of faces towards Baytul-Maqdas. This order was given to Muslims by the Holy Prophet ( ) with no reference to any verse of the Holy Qur’ân. Still, this order was mentioned by the Holy Qur’ân in the above quoted verse as the order of Allâh: The words,

“We did not appoint the Qiblah,” instead of the words,

“The Holy Prophet did not.” are too clear on this point to need more explanation.

This statement of the Holy Qur’ân, thus, evidently proves that the previous order given by the Holy Prophet was based on a revelation which did not form part of the Book. And this is exactly the “unrecited revelation.” The verse of the Holy Qur’ân (2:143) quoted above proves the following facts:

(a) The Holy Prophet used to receive some revelations which are not contained in the Holy Qur’ân.

(b) These revelations were from Allâh Almighty, so much so that the orders based on such revelations were attributed to Allâh Almighty.

(c) The orders based on such revelation were as binding on the believers as the orders of the first kind of revelations, i.e. the verse of the Holy Qur’ân.

(d) These orders were sometimes given so as to test whether or not the Muslims follow the Messenger irrespective of the question that his orders are contained in the Holy Qur’ân or not.

🌙

Obviously, that justifies that indeed muhammad received “unrecited revelations” absent from the quran thus necessarily, every words or actions by muhammad as sanctioned by these “unrecited revelations” is likewise approved by allah and that, being universal laws are obligatory for the muslim community to follow as it say,

Ye have indeed in the Messenger of Allah a beautiful pattern (of conduct) for any one whose hope is in Allah and the Final Day, and who engages much in the Praise of Allah. 

Qur’an 33:21

“Whoever does not believe in Allah and His Messenger, We have prepared a blaze for the unbelievers.”

Al-Qur’an 48:13



🌙

THE MERE FACT THAT ALLAH PRESCRIBED MUHAMMAD AS A PATTERN OF CONDUCT AND THAT ANYONE WHO DONT BELIEVE HIM, WILL BE PUNISHED, NECESSITATES THE FACT THAT, HIS ACTIONS AS SANCTIONED BY QURAN AND THE “UNRECITED REVELATIONS” ARE PATTERNS OF CONDUCT FOR ALL.

Thus the massacre of banu quraisha by virtue of the Torah and a non-muslim’s verdict is a moral pattern for all Muslims in times of war, thus as a war pattern, muslims could use the specific torah law in killing captives or could summon a non-muslin to judge captives, and that as not exceeding the limits of religion.

These are the bounds, the limits set by Allah. Do not then transgress them for who transgress them are evil doers. [Surah Al-Baqarah (2): Ayah 229],

and in Surah Al-Talq, Ayah 1, Allah says:

And those are the set limits of Allah and whosoever transgresses the set limits of Allah then he indeed has wronged himself.”


BY THESE, THE CONTEXTUAL RELATIONSHIP OF THESE TRUTH, USING LOGIC, IT CONCLUDES THAT INDEED MUHAMMAD IS A MURDERER, AND ALLAH, PROMOTING MURDER AS MORAL CONDUCT, OBVIOUSLY MAKES HIMSELF DEMONIC.

How did I come to that conclusion?

Firstly, Allah said, that nothing is left out from the quran, complete and fully detailed.

“We did not leave anything out of this book.”

“The word of your Lord is complete, in truth and justice.”

“Provides the details of everything”

“This book fully detailed”

Logically, if anything is not left out of the book, it means no truth is left outside quran meaning all truth is in quran, implying, all universal truth, as quran is complete in truth. Universal truth in the sense that it is truth that transcends through generations meant for all mankind, thus all truth, that is religious in nature, such as laws and doctrine from adam, to abraham, to moses and jesus, to muhammad being universal truth are all intact in the quran as it is a book of complete universal truth so as claimed:

“We did not leave anything out of this book.”

The word of your Lord is complete, in truth and justice.”



QURAN IS COMPLETE IN TRUTH.

what truth is that?

The sunnah of Allah that cannot change that is a criterion of morality since Adam to Muhammad as it say,

“you will not find in the way (sunnah) of Allāh any change.”

Qur’an is “a guidance for mankind… and the distinction (between right and wrong)



Obviously, quran as complete in truth means complete with all universal religious truth such as laws and doctrine since Adam to Muhammad. Meaning, quran is the conglomeration of all universal religious laws.

Those from the past from Adam to Jesus to muhammad which are not universal truth are obviously not included in the quran likewise revelations which are abrogated, if necessary, likewise abrogated unrecited revelations, if necessary are not included but all universal truth such as religious laws are complete in quran, as a criterion to know good from evil.

 “a guidance for mankind… and the distinction (between right and wrong).”



Logically, all aspect of right and wrong can be discerned by quran as it is complete in truth, meaning, quran has all universal law applicable in all aspect of right or wrong.

What are universal laws in aspect of religion?

A Muslim site explains:

These universal laws of Allāh (subḥānahu wa ta’āla) are not just restricted to matters pertaining to nature alone, rather they extend to the manner in which Allāh (subḥānahu wa ta’āla) deals with mankind, whether that be related to the way in which Allāh (subḥānahu wa ta’āla) guides, brings happiness, provides, gives victory, destroys nations, relieves people from distress, causes progress, failure and gives safety, and more. Many of these laws (sunan) that are related to societies and human interaction are fixed and determined just like the universal laws are too. Thus if a believer wants to understand how Allāh (subḥānahu wa ta’āla) interacts with His creation it is a necessity that he studies and reflects over such sunan which have been mentioned throughout the Qur’ān and Sunnah.

An example of such sunan is the way in which Allāh (subḥānahu wa ta’āla) deals with the hypocrites. Allāh (subḥānahu wa ta’āla) says:

“If the hypocrites and those in whose hearts is disease and those who spread rumors in al-Madīnah do not cease, We will surely incite you against them; then they will not remain your neighbors therein except for a little. Accursed wherever they are found, [being] seized and massacred completely. [This is] the established way (sunnah) of Allāh with those who passed on before; and you will not find in the way (sunnah) of Allāh any change.”[5]

Imam at-Tabari in his exegesis commented on the last part of the verse: “and you will not find in the way (sunnah) of Allāh any change.” Allāh (subḥānahu wa ta’āla) is saying to His Prophet Muhammad (subḥānahu wa ta’āla):  “You will not find, O Muhammad, any change with regards to the sunnah of Allāh (subḥānahu wa ta’āla) that he has decreed for His creation. So be sure to know that He is not going to change His sunnah for these hypocrites.”[6]

Likewise Allāh (subḥānahu wa ta’āla) says:

“And they swore by Allāh their strongest oaths that if a warner came to them, they would be more guided than [any] one of the [previous] nations. But when a warner came to them, it did not increase them except in aversion. [Due to] arrogance in the land and plotting of evil; but the evil plot does not encompass except its own people. Then do they await except the way (sunnah) of the former peoples? But you will never find in the way (sunnah) of Allāh any change, and you will never find in the way of Allāh any alteration.”[7]

🌙

Meaning, universal laws are transcendent laws for all mankind, from Adam to muhammad which were not abrogated and not exclusive for a certain people or tribe. Universal laws are laws applicable for all mankind and would never changed intended throughout time. These has not changed or will be changed. These includes “unrecited revelations” which are universal laws.

THEREFORE, UNIVERSAL LAWS ARE RELIGIOUS LAWS FROM ADAM TO MUHAMMAD MEANT FOR MANKIND WHICH CANNOT BE CHANGED AS IMPLIED,

“you will not find in the way (sunnah) of Allāh any change.”

Therefore, quran being complete in truth suggests, it is the complete book that contains the complete universal, religious truth such as laws and doctrines. Logically, “unrecited revelations” which are universal laws, though possibly, not included in the incomplete quran during when it was yet under the process of completion, but when quran was finally completed in truth, it necessarily must have included all universal truth such as all “unrecited revelations” which are universal truth in essence.

How come?

Bec quran is complete in truth implying complete with the universal laws of Allah that cannot be altered. And that nothing about the sunnah of allah that cannot be changed, implying universal laws, are left outside the quran meaning, all sunnah (universal laws) of allah that is immutable or unchangeable is in quran, so as the verses imply.

We did not leave anything out of this book.”

The word of your Lord is complete, in truth and justice.”

you will not find in the way (sunnah) of Allāh any change.”



Meaning, quran as complete in truth, which truth, are those sunnah of allah that cannot change, since Adams time, these are universal laws, logically speaking, including of course “unrecited revelations” which are universal laws in essence, too, as universal laws are for all mankind, thus necessarily, it must be revealed in the quran, too.

MUHAMMAD’S MASSACRE OF BANU QURAISHA BY VIRTUE OF THE TORAH AND BY VIRTUE OF A NON-MUSLIM’S VERDICT, IS IT A UNIVERSAL LAW?

whether it is by “unrecited revelation” or not, if it is a universal law, quran being complete in universal, religious truth and no truth is left outside it, that massacre “war ethics” being a universal law should have been in the quran, but is it?

The war ethics of massacre of captives by virtue of the Torah or by virtue of a non-muslim’s verdict is a universal law as Islamic ruling in times of war bec of the fact that it was not abrogated, and being a conduct of Muhammad being the model of morality must be as required, emulated as proper conduct in times of war.

 

 

 

“Ye have indeed in the Messenger of Allah a beautiful pattern (of conduct) for any one whose hope is in Allah and the Final Day, and who engages much in the Praise of Allah.-Qur’an 33:21

Allah did not permit Muhammad to do something he did not allow, bec when he did at one time, Allah rebuked him and say,

Why did you allow what allah did not permits?”

Logically, massacre of captives by virtue of the Torah or by virtue of a non-muslim’s verdict, being not abrogated and not specifically, prohibitted and Muhammad being an example of good conduct, makes his act as a universal law, and being in that status, massacre of captives by virtue of a non-muslim’s verdict, must have been in the quran as quran is a complete book of truth such as universal religious laws.

The fact that this war ethics is absent in quran, it makes it inevitably as a lawless crime, thus Muhammad as perpetrator makes him lawless and murderer!

These are the bounds, the limits set by Allah. Do not then transgress them for who transgress them are evil doers. [Surah Al-Baqarah (2): Ayah 229],

And Allah exalting him as model of good conduct, despite Muhammad doing something he did not permits makes it a lawless act. Muhammad being a model of moral conduct, therefore requires lawlessness and murder as good conduct, therefore, assailing himself by saying, do not exceed limits of religion, but then, requiring people to go beyond religious limits, Muhammad as the model, who kills without Quranic sanction,for them, too, to murder even without divine sanction!
why?

Bec they have to emulate Muhammad as Allah required.

Conclusively, Muhammad without divine sanction did massacre a tribe and Allah patronizing it as good conduct makes the two, an evil tandem. One a murderer, the other pushing others to be murderers.

These in essence are traits of Satan.

Advertisements

18 thoughts on “REFUTING MUHAMMAD’S ‘UNRECITED REVELATION’ JUSTIFYING HIS MASSACRE OF JEWS 🌙

  1. It is quite sad that u lack understand of judicial process or a treaty. If a treaty is broken by a party the party that was betrayed has the rights in account to retaliate.
    Banu Qurayzah broke the treaty, Charter of Medina also known as Constitution of Medina, in this treaty everyone had equal religious and human rights. The non-muslims were not required to join battles of Muslims. Everyone had to pay tax that went to the welfare of all that inhabited the area, both Muslim and non-muslims.
    Banu Qurayzah broke the treaty multiple times. Also note there were other Jewish tribes there too why we’re only the Banu Qurayzah killed? Because only they broke the treaty.
    At the battle of the Trench Banu Qurayzah sent their troops to aid the polytheist and attacked the Muslims. There have been other times they broke oaths.
    No, it was not an unrecited revelation. There was indeed command from God to kill Banu Qurayzah, but it was not in form of a Quranic verse, it was just a merely a command to kill them for their treachery.
    I am preparing a THROUGH refuttation to this absurdity u call scholarly work.
    BTW wikiislam is an anti-islamic site, if u want to people to take ur work seriously stop quoting anti-islamic sites, much of their work is total misinterpretation or full of bias.
    BTW, Banu Qurayzah then asked help from the polytheist, they did not help them. Even then no women or child was killed. Only men.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s