MUHAMMAD MISUSED THE TORAH FOR HIS MASSACRE OF JEWS 🌙

A Muslim site says:


{Such was Our) system in the case of those whom We sent before you {to mankind), and you will never find change in Our system. (Surah Bani Israil, 17:77)”

🌎

CONCLUSION: UNIVERSAL LAWS OF ALLAH SINCE THE PAST ARE UNALTERABLE AND STILL, IN EFFECT!

WHAT ARE THE UNIVERSAL LAWS?

Islam defined it in this verse:


“Say (O Muslims): ‘We believe in Allaah and that which has been sent down to us and that which has been sent down to Ibraaheem (Abraham), Ismaa’eel (Ishmael), Ishaaq (Isaac), Ya‘qoob (Jacob), and to Al-Asbaat [the offspring of the twelve sons of Ya‘qoob (Jacob)], and that which has been given to Moosa (Moses) and ‘Isa (Jesus), and that which has been given to the Prophets from their Lord. We make no distinction between any of them, and to Him we have submitted (in Islam)’” [al-Baqarah 2:136] 

“O you who believe! Believe in Allaah, and His Messenger (Muhammad), and the Book (the Qur’aan) which He has sent down to His Messenger, and the Scripture which He sent down to those before (him); and whosoever disbelieves in Allaah, His Angels, His Books, His Messengers, and the Last Day, then indeed he has strayed far away”[al-Nisaa’ 4:136] 

Therefore all existing laws in their books given to these such as moses and jesus are universal laws and are still in effect, if by context, it is not exclusive for a particular person or group.

MUHAMMAD USED A SPECIFIC TORAH LAW FOR MURDER OF A TRIBE, clarifying further that indeed the Torah (law) of moses is a universal law that must be practiced by the Muslims, implying, every universal law in moses book!

MUHAMMAD MASSACRED A TRIBE BY USING THE TORAH AS REFERENCE!

The people of (Banu) Quraiza agreed to accept the verdict of Sa`d bin Mu`adh. So the Prophet sent for Sa`d, and the latter came (riding) a donkey and when he approached the Mosque, the Prophet said to the Ansar, “Get up for your chief or for the best among you.” Then the Prophet said (to Sa`d).” These (i.e. Banu Quraiza) have agreed to accept your verdict.” Sa`d said, “KILL THEIR WARRIORS and take their offspring as captives, “On that the Prophet said, “You have judged according to Allah’s Judgment,” or said, “according to the King’s judgement.”(Sahih al-Bukhari volume 5, Book 59, Hadith 447)

HERE IS A SCHOLAR EXPLAINING THE WHOLE SCENARIO:

Dr F Ajmeri – Dawat-Ul Quran – Surah Ahzab 33:26 commentary – Volume 3, Pages 1448-1449:

“Refers to, Bani Quraizah who lived in the eastern part of Medina and were Jews. The Prophet (S.A.W.) hade made an agreement with them after migration, but they did not keep their part of the covenant, and at the time of the Battle of the Trench they broke their covenant and assisted the enemy. When the Prophet (S.A.W.) returned from the Battle of the Trench, Jibril (Peace be upon him) came with the message from Allah that he should turn to Bani Quraizah without delay and military action be taken against the said tribe. Therefore, the Prophet at once turned to go towards their colony with his companions, and there he surrounded their place. The siege lasted for 25 days after which they came down from their fortress on this condition that their matter should be decided by the chief of the tribe of Aus, Sa’ad bin Ma’az, who was their ally. Accordingly, the judgment given by Sa’ad (R) was:
“All their males who are able to fight should be killed, their women and children should be made captive, and their properties should be distrubuted…


On this Prophet (S.A.W.) said that he have judgment according to the divine command. This judgment of Sa’ad bin Ma’az (R) is according to the Torah, in which this law of fighting has been enunciated:

“When you draw near to a city to fight against it, offer terms of peace to it. And if its answer to you is peace and it opens to you, then all the people who are found in it shall do forced labor for you and shall serve you. But if it makes no peace with you, but makes war against you, then you shall besiege it; and when The Lord your God gives it into your hand you shall put all its males to the sword, but the women and the little ones, the cattle, and everything else in the city, all its spoil, you shall take as booty for yourselves; and you shall enjoy the spoil of your enemies, which The Lord your God has given you. (Det 20 :10 to 14 – RSV.)

In this way the Jewish Bani Quraizah were removed for Medina. Such a harsh attitude was taken against them because before this a tribe of the Jews, Bani Nadir, had also broken their covenant and they were allowed to leave with their women and children with some property, in spite of their conspiracies and broken promises. But from here also they continued hatching conspiracies against Muslims and troubling them. The Bani Quraizah broke their covenant in such an emergent situation that the idolaters had laid siege with a very huge army and were about to attack Muslims, on such an occasion the Jews stabbed their allies in the back, therefore it was inevitable that such traitors were given the severest punishment. It may be noted that the number of those who were gives was not more than 800 and the number of women and children who were taken into prisoners was about 1000. – (Ghazwah Bani Quraiz

🌎

THE REASON THEY KILLED THEM WAS BEC THEY TOOK THEIR RIGHT FROM THE TORAH as it say:
On this Prophet (S.A.W.) said that he have judgment according to the divine command. This judgment of Sa’ad bin Ma’az (R) is according to the Torah, in which this law of fighting has been enunciated:

“When you draw near to a city to fight against it, offer terms of peace to it. And if its answer to you is peace and it opens to you, then all the people who are found in it shall do forced labor for you and shall serve you. But if it makes no peace with you, but makes war against you, then you shall besiege it; and when The Lord your God gives it into your hand you shall put all its males to the sword, but the women and the little ones, the cattle, and everything else in the city, all its spoil, you shall take as booty for yourselves; and you shall enjoy the spoil of your enemies, which The Lord your God has given you. (Det 20 :10 to 14 – RSV.)

🌎

LOGICAL ANALYSIS:
Muhammad massacred his Jew captives by virtue of the Torah law, and as IRFI war ethics say, captives who sworn not to war Islam would be killed after such a time when they break their promise and then fight Muslims again, which as we see is the case of banu quraisha.

The question is, there was no specific islamic ruling Muhammad based his judgment from to massacre them but he took authority from the Torah law as universal law which according to allah is yet in effect, yet, if we look at it closely, the torah was exclusive for Israel to follow as explicitly shown below. Exclusive for Israel as it was a law contextually with destroying Hittites, Canaanites, amorites etc….thus it was a law only for Israel!

Muslims say that there are random alteration in the bible, thus inevitably, even the Torah has corruption. Only those confirmed by quran are not thus otherwise than what quran confirms, bible torah is unreliable, yet it cannot be denied that there are parts of the torah that is exclusive for Israel such as sabbath (confirmed in Quran) and priesthood as these are not Islamic, but confirmed in the Quran.



Quran confirms the Jewish priesthood, thus it was one of the ordained law for Israel as described in the Torah.



Lo! We did reveal the At-Taurah, wherein is guidance and a light, by which the prophets who surrendered (unto Allah) judged the Jews, and the rabbis and the priests (judged) by such of Allah’s Scripture as they were bidden to observe, and thereunto were they witnesses. So fear not mankind, but fear Me. And barter not My revelations for a little gain. Whoso judgeth not by that which Allah hath revealed: such are disbelievers.

— Quran, sura 5 (Al-Ma’ida), ayat 44[1]


Even sabbath was confirmed by Quran.


YUSUFALI: And well ye knew those amongst you who transgressed in the matter of the Sabbath: We said to them: “Be ye apes, despised and rejected.” (2:65)

YUSUFALIAsk them concerning the town standing close by the sea. Behold! they transgressed in the matter of the Sabbath. For on the day of their Sabbath their fish did come to them, openly holding up their heads, but on the day they had no Sabbath, they came not: thus did We make a trial of them, for they were given to transgression. (7:163)


These Quranic texts confirm the Torah law of sabbath and priesthood, which muslims do not follow.

Why do muslims reject sabbath and priesthood as a law?

They said, it is abrogated.

Quran likewise confirms one of the revelations given to moses:

And [remember] when Moses said to his people: ‘O my people, call in remembrance the favour of God unto you, when he produced prophets among you, made you kings, and gave to you what He had not given to any other among the peoples. O my people, enter the Holy Land which God has assigned unto you, and turn not back ignominiously, for then will ye be overthrown, to your own ruin.'” [Qur’an 5:20-21]

🌎

As we can see, Allah’s revelation to moses as confirmatory of the Torah was verified by quran saying, israel was given to the israelites, therefore, it implied, an exclusive law for Israel, thus when it say, believe the books of moses it probably mean, the universal laws in these books must be practiced, and the exclusive laws in these meant particularly for a person or tribe such as israel is exclusive for that person or tribe only.

Thus, Allah’s revelation consistently from the past to present has in it universal laws as well as exclusive laws for certain individuals. The things muslims follow are the universal laws confirmed in the quran.

The question therefore is, how is the verse in the Torah about “killing all male captives” a universal law and not exclusive for Israel?

Here is a premise:

 

 

🌎

The Islamic defender/scholar said, Quran (textbook A) is clarified and explained by the hadith’s (textbook B), therefore Muhammad’s killing of captives (textbook B) as referred from Torahs “kill all male __captives” is a clarification and explanation for the Quran (textbook A).

Question!

Where in Quran (textbook A) did it say to kill captives by virtue of the torah as the actions of muhammad killing Jew captives by virtue of the torah (textbook B) were clarificatory to it?

This is what is in the Quran:

 “And do not kill any one whom Allah has forbidden, except for a just cause, and whoever is slain unjustly, We have indeed given to his heir authority, so let him not exceed the just limits in slaying; surely he is aided (Quran 17:33).”

 In other words, killing is permitted only when it is justified, what justifies killing captives?

None. There are only two provision for muslims regarding captives. One, generosity, to free by mercy. Two, to free by ransom.

If you meet in battle those who disbelieve, smite their necks. Then, if you have thoroughly subdued them, the bind them firmly, so there will be a time for either generosity or ransom for them until cessation of the war.” [Sûrah Muhammad: 4]


GENEROSITY OR RANSOM, that is the only provision regarding the fate of captives, if not, what justifies killing captives as written in the Quran, Muhammad’s actions being clarificatory to it?

If none, conclusively,

MUHAMMAD MISUSED THE TORAH FOR HIS BLOODLUST TO KILL PEOPLE. HE IS A MURDERER, WITHOUT NO GODLY BEARING AT ALL!

Some say though, Muhammad has revelations outside Quran, thus there were actions he did outside Quranic ruling.

A rebuttal by someone:

. “If we interpret 53:1-5 as “whatever prophet says is revelation (outside Qur’an)” then what about the following verses:

May Allah pardon you, ; why did you give them permission ? Until it was evident to you who were truthful and you knew  the liars. [Qur’an 09:43]

So, here we see Allah pointing out that Muhammad gave a wrong command.

O Prophet, why do you prohibit what Allah has made lawful for you, seeking the approval of your wives? And Allah is Forgiving and Merciful. [Qur’an 66:01]

Here we observe that prophet made the mistake of forbidding something which Allah did not forbid.

My question is, if 53:1-5 means that whatever prophet ordered or did out of free-will is revelation from Allah, how can prophet make mistakes as shown in the above ayats?”

💀

Logically, what it means by “whatever prophet say is revelation” concerns everything he says regarding Quran and not his personal words, bec his personal words are sometimes wrong therefore his personal words were not allahs revelation thus when he said, 

“On this Prophet (S.A.W.) said that he have judgment according to the divine command.”

Referring to Torahs “kill all male captives” as his basis for killing jew captives, it could either be his personal words, which in essence could be wrong as he was wrong before or it could be a revelation. If a revelation, it must be in the quran.

53:1-5

By the star when it descends, your companion [Muhammad] has not strayed, nor has he erred, Nor does he speak from [his own] inclination. It is not but a revelation revealed, taught to him by one intense .

As suggested by these, whatever Muhammad therefore do, in regards to the muslims as a collective acts must have necessary ruling from the Quran, logically speaking, as actions otherwise than Quran, sometimes he erred as presented above thus when Allah said, whatever Muhammad say or do is his revelation, and that regarding it, he never erred, it is therefore emphatically referring, to muhammad’s words or actions sanctioned by Quranic ruling, as otherwise Muhammad erred which is inconsistent with what Allah said that muhammad don’t err, meaning, he don’t err regarding Quranic revelation, whereas, his personal inkling sometimes were wrong.

MEANING, EVERY WORDS/ACTIONS OF MUHAMMAD CONSIDERED TO BE FROM ALLAH’S REVELATION WERE THOSE ONLY SANCTIONED BY QURAN, AND NOT OUTSIDE IT!

It is corroborated by the claim that Quran is “complete” revelation! Or fully detailed, Meaning, all laws are in Quran, which by the hadiths are clarified, therrefore muhammads deeds in the hadiths such as killing captives must have quranic basis.

Quran 6:114] Shall I seek other than God as a source of law, when He has revealed to you this book fully detailed? Those who received the scripture recognize that it has been revealed from your Lord, truthfully. You shall not harbor any doubt. 

[Quran 6:115] The word of your Lord is complete, in truth and justice.

When Quran is fully detailed, complete in truth, and it did not say, Muhammad can teach things which are not in it, rationally, every teaching muhammad teach that is not in Qur’an therefore  is false.

Why?

Bec Qur’an is full or complete, and without specification of extra-quranic teachings suggests that every teaching must have Qur’anic basis.

4:171

:

O people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians)! Do not exceed the limits in your religion, nor say of Allah aught but the truth.


And bec you must not exceed the limits that Quran is the sole basis of truth and hadith’s are mere clarificatory to it, the question therefore is, where in quran did allah permits killing captives or did quran permitted Muhammad to use torah or any mans verdict such as saad as basis to kill captives as i cannot see anything?

If none, conclusively, Muhammad exceeds and transgressed the limits thus, a murderer.

These are the bounds, the limits set by Allah. Do not then transgress them for who transgress them are evil doers. [Surah Al-Baqarah (2): Ayah 229],

and in Surah Al-Talq, Ayah 1, Allah says:

And those are the set limits of Allah and whosoever transgresses the set limits of Allah then he indeed has wronged himself.


THEREFORE, MUHAMMAD MISUSED THE TORAH FOR HIS BLOODLUST TO KILL PEOPLE. HE IS A MURDERER, WITHOUT NO GODLY BEARING AT ALL!

And Allah?

. And whoever disobeys Allah and His Messenger has certainly strayed into clear error. [Quran 33:36]

Therefore Allah upholds Muhammad’s massacre of banu quraisha but then, ALLAH IS A LIAR TO HAVE GLORIFIED MUHAMMAD’S MASSACRE OF JEWS BY VIRTUE OF THE TORAH AND SAAD’S VERDICT , IF SO, THAT THIS IS NOT HIS REVELATION FOR MUHAMMAD TO DO, WHICH IF IT IS, THEN NECESSARILY IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN WRITTEN IN THE QURAN!

So where in the Quran any ruling of killing captives by virtue of the Torah or by virtue of a non-muslim’s verdict (saad)?

AND WHERE DID ALLAH REVEALED TO HIM THAT THE TORAH “KILL ALL MALE CAPTIVES” IS A UNIVERSAL LAW THUS APPLICABLE FOR KILLING THE TRIBE AND NOT EXCLUSIVE FOR ISRAEL?

If none, it is confirmatory of Muhammad as murderer and Allah, a liar!

REFUTING MUHAMMAD’S “UNRECITED REVELATION” JUSTIFYING HIS MASSACRE OF JEWS…Read here:  open me!

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “MUHAMMAD MISUSED THE TORAH FOR HIS MASSACRE OF JEWS 🌙

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s