BIBLE SAID, ISLAM IS THE ENEMY OF GOD! ©

Bible indeed said that. Islam is the enemy of God. It confirmed beforehand the falsehood of islam and its inherent nature as archrival of god.

First of all, god said, there is no religion of god emerging from Arabs, the lineage of Ishmael as the religion of god would be from the lineage of Isaac!

Genesis 17:5,7

[5]Neither shall thy name any more be called Abram, but thy name shall be Abraham; for a father of many nations have I made thee.

[7]And I will establish my covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee.

The covenant was, for god to be a god to the people. Which people?

Genesis 17:20-21

[20]And as for Ishmael, I have heard thee: Behold, I have blessed him, and will make him fruitful, and will multiply him exceedingly; twelve princes shall he beget, and I will make him a great nation.

[21]But my covenant will I establish with Isaac, which Sarah shall bear unto thee at this set time in the next year.

The covenant THAT GOD WOULD BE THEIR GOD was not for Ishmael and his seed but for Isaac and his seed. Logically, expressing the truth that nowhere did god intended a true religion as coming from Ishmael’s Arabs but from isaac’s progeny. 

That proves islam as false religion!

They would argue, but…but…quran is full of miracles, signs and wonders, such as precognition of factual science! This could not be from anyone other than god!

Yes! Indeed as god foretold, he would give signs and wonders to false prophets and as jesus likewise foretold that false prophets could show signs and wonders as it say,

God said beforehand, that he would give false prophets as muhammad et al, signs and wonders such as prophecies and factual science, that would come to pass in the future or would be a reality, fulfilled or discovered in the future as it say,

Deuteronomy 13:1-3

[1]If there arise among you a prophet, (such as muhammad) or a dreamer of dreams, and giveth thee a sign or a wonder,(such as prophecies and science)

[2]And the sign or the wonder come to pass,(or become reality, fulfilled or discovered) whereof he spake unto thee, saying, Let us go after other supreme god, (such as allah) which thou hast not known, and let us serve them;

[3]Thou shalt not hearken unto the words of that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams: for the LORD your God proveth (test) you, to know whether ye love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul.

By this reality, we know therefore that muhammad received revelation of signs and wonders from god as a form of test for bible believers whether they would follow allah bec of these signs and wonders, or to stick to the bible god.

Islam is false bec it diverts your faith from god to another god, allah which by it, confirmed what god said, that these signs and wonders he gave to false prophets is not confirmation of their divine inspiration but of their falsehood such as when muhammad persuades you towards a different god, allah, against the bible god,

Thus making islam false.

Muslims! Don’t pride yourselves from Quranic signs and wonders as beforehand, it was already predicted to be from a false prophet!

My third proof that islam is false is bec, jesus is the last prophet not muhammad!

Mark 12:1-6,8

[1]And he began to speak unto them by parables. A certain man planted a vineyard, and set an hedge about it, and digged a place for the winefat, and built a tower, and let it out to husbandmen, and went into a far country. 

[2]And at the season he sent to the husbandmen a servant, that he might receive from the husbandmen of the fruit of the vineyard. 

[3]And they caught him, and beat him, and sent him away empty. 

[4]And again he sent unto them another servant; and at him they cast stones, and wounded him in the head, and sent him away shamefully handled. 

[5]And again he sent another; and him they killed, and many others; beating some, and killing some. 

[6]Having yet therefore one son, his wellbeloved, he sent him also last unto them, saying, They will reverence my son. 

[8]And they took him, and killed him, and cast him out of the vineyard. 

Clearly, jesus as prophet was sent last!

My fourth proof is this, Christianity would be scattered in every nation preaching the gospel openly, including Saudi Arabia, as it say,

Even kedar of Saudi Arabia would be christianized as it was prophesied as it say,

MY FIFTH PROOF IS THIS:

The claim that islam would dominate the whole world is by itself another confirmation that islam is false, the enemy of god. Let’s first see how they claim it and their Islamic basis.

This reality makes islam the enemy of god. Islam as dominating the world would be a profuse reason to believe, the world would be Islamic, the government Islamic and sharia as the established law.

Therefore, the world being Islamic, it incriminated itself as the enemy of god bec of the fact that all Islamic countries when islam dominated the world such as Iran and Saudi Arabia would battle Jerusalem and god as it say,

All nations, Islamic nations would battle Jerusalem and god thereby making islam, the ruling power over these countries, an archrival of truth and the enemy of god.

But naturally, Muslims would object. They would say, the bible is randomly corrupted, thus those verses are corrupted versions. 

Though a weak argument, nothing of such sort is true.

The bible is inerrant bec if there was random corruption, why were not the prophecies and bible science corrupted?!

To prove islam is true, show a single corrupted account of bible science or prophecies, which if you do would falsify Christianity whereas if you failed, is proof to the reliability of this blog, that indeed islam is false, by biblical testimonies!

On the mean time, it is established by these biblical proofs that, in the affirmative nature of these, indeed, islam is the enemy of god!

MCGI: THE YET IMPURE CHURCH!

Bro Eli, I don’t intend to apostate myself from MCGI, as I revealed in my blog, I was baptized Sept 29, 2000, but my name is missing in the MCGI records. Even if brothers and sisters reject me and despite you calling me an impostor once, my heart is fixed, I will never detach myself from the church, specially now, that I have proven to myself with infallible proof that this is indeed the true church. Notwithstanding the fact that the calling in my heart has never change despite the debilitating schizoprenia i have, that forced me to be inactive. My baptism of fire. Faith never died, it become stronger. Its immutable. Strong and certain!

Nevertheless, being inactive, I have my own biblical concepts which if perfected, I believe it would equally be MCGI. On the meantime, I’m undergoing the process of perfecting these concepts, god willing. This is my wish, to learn true doctrine even by myself through divine guidance.

I hope noone would feel betrayed if sometimes, actually sporadically,  I vocally, expressed opposition to what Bro eli preach but it doesn’t mean, I am against the truth or Bro eli as my minister and messenger of god.

Let’s look at my sporadic opposition like this:

We could be both in a condition wherein, this condition is biblically in right context,  in the sense, that truth has sometimes different angles all of us are immersed in, playing different parts of the truth as it was intended to convene to the fulfillment of the new covenant–the perfection of knowledge.

Please understand my point as we go along.

Bro eli said:

Bro Eli is right, God is not a god of contradictions. His words don’t contradicts. Yet nowhere did he guarantee that his preachers/ministers are infallible or inerrant. 

Mcgi has itself too records of amending doctrines. So being the true church, it validated the biblical reality of the church yet imperfection. I hope Bro eli would take mine as mere suggestion and not actually as rebellion or an attempt to destroy him. I am doing this as collaborative way of perfecting the truth, if ever bro eli would consider mine, if by a chance, my thought of the church as yet impure is true. If not may god enlightens me!. I believe the church is undergoing the process of perfection as silver is purged 7times by fire so as it say,

Being under the process of refinement, there would still be impurities, that needed correction, that is for perfection.

As prophesied, there would be a time of correcting errors as understanding would inevitably come.

We have not come yet to that point of perfect understanding, so as I believed. There is no guarantee yet of perfect understanding. If there is, Bro eli should have been a perfect man, inerrant and infallible. But then his accusation against INC’s flaws is undermining the reality that if INC is the true church, it could still be undergoing yet the process of refinement as predicted by Zechariah and Isaiah, therefore the necessity to rectify errors is a necessity, thus errors in doctrines are not actually valid reasons to falsify a church, given the argument that if they are the true church they could still be purifying itself from errors so as prophesied.

Therefore, we cannot falsify a church by its errors.

MCGI likewise, has share of amending doctrines.

I was attending church service in cubao year 2000. We prayed by kneeling like catholics. Lately, I heard bro eli attacking catholics of their way of praying, kneeling down, and during these times, he amended the church’s praying posture to prostration.

Likewise, we didn’t pray towards the east then. Now, he amended it.

He also changed the name of the church used by bro perez by specifically, substituting suhay with saligan.

That is some I could reliably attest.These proves the imperfection of the church. Errors must be rectified. 

Thus, it is inappropriate for fault-finding when we likewise wasn’t flawless. 

This is not as an insult or contempt. A subordinate having nerves to oppose his leader when dutibound he must submit. Nevertheless, submission to a leader is not implied as total submission when nothing, even a slight provocation for contrast, as means of suggesting something for consideration is allowed. We are one body that concerns for every part for edification. If you would hate me for suggesting something adverse to the norms, then there is no true brotherhood. If you condemn me inconsiderate of my thoughts, you don’t consider me as one of you. 

The church is a church of fellowship where everyone’s thought is either appreciated or corrected. If not, it would be authoritarian!

Even then, even if you reject me, what harm is there for me? You should be thinking of yourselves. You might be doing harm to yourselves.

But then, if everything is by faith, what basis do I have to oppose my minister?

Am I authorized?

I believe so. Let me justify.

TO STRIVE WITH WORDS FOR PROFIT! Is this not the very essence of debates, bible expo and likewise consultation?!

This I believe gives me right to strive with bro eli with words that when settled would be for profit. Thus I have right to oppose him for a better consequence: the establishment of truth, tested as silver! Bec for this matter we are Christians, intended to care where love’s inevitable pursuit is perfection. 

I am doing this for one purpose, for the establishment of the truth in its perfect state, if possible.

If I am wrong, at least I could say, I did my obligation as a christian, that is, to care, to love for the church, according to the level of my understanding and the opportunity of circumstances god gave me as effective Christian.

For the love of god!

TOPIC: THE CORRECT GREEK COPY (BART EHRMAN VERSUS ME)

Here is a partial look of our conversation: 

That is our initial clash. As you can see, my other opponents defending bart deleted their comments. I’m waiting for his response. Its been two days. Let’s wait for development. You can view it directly in his page.. I’ll provide the link VIEW HERE!

I’ll update this blog if this conversation would pursue. Wait for it. Thanks!

Contact me here-email: butzdenn

Lastly for this part, Raymond Parker III, finds discrepancies in the scriptures!

 YES! in your level of understanding, you could find many, elevate it to its proper level, do you think, there are still discrepancies?! I don’t think so. 

ISIS IS THE “ONLY” TRUE ISLAM!

There is no god but allah and muhammad is his messenger…”

Sunni scholars, the intrepid defenders of faith, claim that sunni (Medina sect)  is the  true islam.

Its hypothetical. 

Did allah said sunni (Medina sect) is the true islam!?

NO! HE DID NOT SPECIFY ANYTHING TO THAT SORT!

WHICH AMONG VARIOUS ISLAMIC SECT IS THE TRUE ISLAM!?

True islam has this distinction: 

Firstly, true islam consists of the believer of ahl-al sunna, the words and practices of muhammad, which by it, they are qualified as sunni.

Excerpt 1

They are the main body of believers, the greater in number amongst the prophesied 73muslim sects, that would emerge.

Excerpt 2

TRUE ISLAM has two distinct feature. Firstly, it is Sunni. Secondly, it is the main body of Muslim believers.

Which among various Islamic sect is sunni?!

I know two, these are:

  • Sunni (Medina sect)
  • ISIS 

ISIS as sunni:

Excerpt 3

    The other feature of true islam is, it is the main body. The dilemma is, is it the main body without a caliph (sunni of medina) or the main body with a caliph (ISIS)?! 

    It was not specified.

    But then, in reference to prophecy,  Muhammad foretold the corruption of the islam sect, referring to the one that originated from his time, the sunni of medina, therefore the mainstream sunni now, the medina sect, is a corrupt islam, as it say,

    Excerpt 4

    Bec the Sunni of medina was corrupted, it would be replaced by another group, as it say,

    Excerpt 5

    The one that replaced it, is ISIS, another sunni group. 

    But then, sunni scholars (medina sect) claim that ISIS is not true islam as they say,

    Excerpt 6

    These scholars asked ISIS, who gave you authority over the Muslim ummah?!
    I’ll ask the same for these scholars, who gave you authority over the Muslim ummah?!

    Did Allah!? 

    Sunni (Medina sect) claimed they are the true islam. ISIS claimed they are the true islam! The new caliphate as foretold by Muhammad.

    Who then is telling the truth?!

    We can answer that if we know what is true islam!

    THIS IS TRUE ISLAM:

    • Muhammad can kill anyone even if it was not commanded by Allah nor has any Quranic sanction. He could kill according to his personal desire even if it was not ordered by allah. It was exemplified when he massacred captives from banu quraisha by allowing Sa’ad, a non-muslim, to make verdict. Allah has no such Quranic sanction for Muhammad to kill by virtue of a non-muslim’s verdict. Therefore, allah allowed leaders of islam, to authorized killing by way of their personal decision, even without quranic sanction, muhammad being the pattern of conduct as an Islamic ethic. Complete explanation here:  CLICK ME!
    • Muhammad can kill anyone through presumption of guilt, as exemplified when he massacred boys as he guessed who was liable of penal responsibility through the presence of pubic hair and spared boys without pubic hair, bec these were not liable of penal responsibility. Complete explanation here: CLICK ME!

    What is penal responsibility?

    It is having age of reason to understand that a criminal act is liable for penalty. It is the necessary component that makes a person guilty of a crime and the reason that he must be killed.

    Muhammad regarded the ones with pubic hair as liable of penal responsibility. He thought, they are of the right age, to have understanding that criminal acts are meant for penalties! 

    Was he correct that all these youngsters with pubic hair is in the right age of understanding?! 

    No! Bec scientifically, even with pubic hair, sometimes their mental age is below their actual physical age, therefore even with pubic hair, their mental reasoning, understanding, could still be that of a 9years old or 10, therefore not liable of penal responsibility.

    Therefore muhammad guessed that having pubic hair guarantees guilt of a crime when in fact he was wrong bec having pubic hair doesnt guarantee that one is in the right mind to understand right or wrong. Some have mental age that is below than their physical age, thus they have not yet the capacity to understand so as science have declared! Thus having pubic doesnt necessarily mean, he is guilty of a ctime!

    Therefore, being a pattern of conduct, true islam allows killing by means of presumption of guilt, or guessing who is guilty, then kill them!

    • Muhammad killed boys with pubic hairs and spared those with none. He did it even if allah did not say, “when warriors are boys, kill those only with pubic hair.” NONE! HE DID NOT! Therefore, it is Islamic to kill by personal decision whoever the leader thinks is guilty, and spare those he thinks is innocent, even without Allah’s sanction!
    • Allah sanctioned the killing of those that spread falsehood against allah or muhammad. It is practiced by Saudi sharia. Therefore, Christians spreading alleged lies as islam is false, allah is demonic, muhammad is false prophet must likewise be killed. Complete explanation here: 
      CLICK ME!
    • Muhammad consented the killing of an innocent person bec she insulted him.


    Excerpt 7

    • Islam uses compulsion of religion, by forcing christians not to practice their religion in Medina but allows it in other places. Therefore, wherever islam declared a place as “only islam domain” no other religion is allowed meaning, islam has right to impose “only islam domain” on their territories even for the whole world if ever they chooses such as how they do in Saudi Arabia!
    • That is true islam!

    Sunni (Medina sect) don’t do those fully thus conclusively as muhammad imposed, this sunni sect is the prophesied corrupted version of islam. ISIS on the other hand fits perfectly to this true islamic nature. They kill anyone by their own personal decision by the caliph Abu bakr. They kill Christians when they were considered kufar, and not innocent.

    What are possible objections?!

    Allah said not to destroy buildings and specifically, NOT TO KILL INNOCENT PEOPLE!

    Who are innocent in true Islamic logic?

    • Muhammad can kill by personal decision even without Quranic sanction.

    • Muhammad guessed who are guilty of death. Therefore, he guessed who are innocent from not. Therefore, it is by muhammad or the leader of islam, who would proclaim who are innocent from not by mere guess.

    • Muhammad decided who are guilty or innocent by his personal decision, without Allah’s decision or order, therefore it is by the leader who decides who are guilty or innocent.

    Who are therefore innocent?

    Those that the leader proclaimed as innocent. If you kill someone not labeled as guilty you killed innocent people. Therefore whoever the leader spared is logically, the ones considered innocent. And whoever, he labeled guilty are not innocent, even if his crime is simply, insulting allah or muhammad or spreading false news such as how muhammad consented the killing of someone whose only crime is insulting muhammad.

    ISIS destroys churches. Is it Islamic when allah said, do not destroy buildings?

    Yes! Islamic. Selective destruction of churches.

     Do you not destroy churches if ever they would erect one in Medina?

    Excerpt 8

    Selective in the sense that, if the leader decides that only islam is the accepted religion in a selected place as an islamic truth such as what happens in medina, it should be authoritative. Meaning, islam could proclaim any place they rule over as “only islam domain” as what happens in Saudi arabia therefore, it must be authoritative. Thus when ISIS, being true islam if ever it wants islam as the only religion in the world, no other religion is therefore allowed wherever they have power thus the elimination of any traces of it. Thus the destruction of church edifices. 

    That is the context of what allah said, don’t destroy churches! It means don’t destroy churches where the leader has not sanctioned an “only islam domain” but where it is imposed, no other religion must coexist with islam!

    With these reality, logical and empiric, who between sunni (medina sect) and ISIS is true islam??

    Who kills people by guessing who is guilty of death, (such as the “pubic hair” incident) and who kills even without quranic sanction but by personal decision (such as massacre accdg to the non-muslim’s verdict)?!

    Who kills by being the ones deciding who is guilty or innocent through the presumption of the leader (such as the “pubic hair” incident)!?

    Who kills anyone by being the one deciding who is guilty or innocent even without Allah’s approval or Quranic sanction such as in the “pubic hair” incident?!

    Who!?

    ISIS!

    Therefore by being fittingly, compliant to the abovementioned qualifiers, and as sunni (Medina sect) fails, muhammad therefore through his prophecy, confirmed ISIS as true Islam, the replacement of the one that originated from Muhammad’s time, the medina sect being a corrupt islam!

    Lastly,

    For speaking against ISIS, who give you authority as a representative of true islam!?

    🌙

    Note: Excerpts are not mine. These are photographs from various blogsites. Trace the sources by typing portions of the excerpts in your browsers!

      CAN DEAD SAINTS HEAR PRAYERS, CATHOLICS!?

      Catholic.com says:

      Let’s consider their only reference for their defense,

      Revelation 5:8

      [8]And when he had taken the book, the four beasts and four and twenty elders fell down before the Lamb, having every one of them harps, and golden vials full of incense, which are the prayers of saints.

      Revelation 8:3-4

      [3]And another angel came and stood at the altar, having a golden censer; and there was given unto him much incense, that he should offer it with the prayers of all saints upon the golden altar which was before the throne.

      [4]And the smoke of the incense, which came with the prayers of the saints, ascended up before God out of the angel’s hand.

      Symbolic. There are two kinds of incense there: prayers and an other incense.
      These are symbolic. The beasts and 24elders, heavenly creatures, have the prayers of saints. 

      Does that mean, they can read the hearts of saints as they silently prayed by heart?!

      Where did it say?!

      Or, could it be, that these prayers were relayed to them by the holy spirit, as intercessor in behalf of the saints?!

      Read:

      Romans 8:26

      [26]Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not what we should pray for as we ought: but the Spirit itself maketh intercession in behalf of us with groanings which cannot be uttered.

      How could the holy spirit communicated our prayers to the heavenly creatures?!

      I don’t know but there is something called telepathy. It could be through that. Could be.

      Jumping to conclusion, Catholics?

      Nothing in there suggests that other else than the godhead could read hearts!

      ONLY THE BEINGS IN THE GODHEAD READ HEARTS! “ONLY”!

      1 Kings 8:39

      [39]Then hear thou in heaven thy dwelling place, and forgive, and do, and give to every man according to his ways, whose heart thou knowest; (for thou, even thou only, knowest the hearts of all the children of men;)

      They might say, yes! Only god know the fullness of the heart but dead saints, spirit beings, in nature could know only full thoughts in it!

      Its non-sense! Logically, if you could see prayers inside each person, or all persons, then it follows that you know all his thoughts! Bec prayers are like any other, its thought! Therefore, you know all thoughts of the whole mankind!

      One saint, could possibly, read the full thoughts of all mankind.

      But then, on the contrary, these saints in the spirit word cannot read prayers in the heart, as evident by the absence of knowledge about judgment day and the signs that precedes it as they were full of questions,

      Revelation 6:9-11

      [9]And when he had opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God, and for the testimony which they held:

      [10]And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?
      [11]And white robes were given unto every one of them; and it was said unto them, that they should rest yet for a little season, until their fellowservants also and their brethren, that should be killed as they were, should be fulfilled.

      Obviously, during these times, catholics would be praying to them like,

      “Saint John Paul! Santa Claus! Saint Valentine! Saint Mother Theresa! ALL SAINTS!
      WE BESEECH YOU!

      WE ARE THE MOST HOLY CATHOLICS!POPE! BISHOPS!CARDINALS!
      WE WOULD BUTCHER OUR ENEMIES!AND HERRETICS!
      PROMISE!
      WE ASK FOR YOUR INTERCESSION TO SAVE OUR FELLOW CATHOLICS IN THE HANDS OF MUSLIMS,  BUTCHERING THEM!!”

      Had they known these prayers, they wont be ignorantly asking, when do you avenge us?

      The mere fact that they were asking is they cannot read the church praying for safety!

      Nevertheless, it could be justified, if they dont know the bible specifically, this verse that say, “until all your brothers intended to be killed would be killed”

      BUT COULD IT BE, THAT THESE SAINTS ARE NOT PRIVY OF THIS VERSE?!

      But the apostles like Peter, who Catholics claimed were killed is among them, and the holy spirit is with them as guidance to all truth?! Thus they should know the verse which say,

      until their fellowservants also and their brethren, that should be killed as they were, should be fulfilled.”

      But why were they ignorant of the fact that during those times, prayers about catholics being killed were directed to them?

      Can they not read prayers silently spoken through the heart to know killing of catholics is happening, thus knowing the truth, that christians must first be killed, and knowing through relayed prayers that killing christian is on-going, they should not be ignorant when is judgment?!

      Judgment would come after  Christians meant to be killed are killed. Yet these are ignorant! They don’t know!

      Peter don’t know likewise!?

      Implying, they are not privy of what is happening on earth, as nothing of these sort can be relayed effectively through prayers by the fact that they cannot read the heart.

      How come?!

      They were asking, how long do you avenge us?, when if they knew killing is going on, through relayed prayers, they should not be asking, as they knew beforehand, that killing christians must first happen, as they knew the bible!

      THE MERE FACT THAT THEY WERE ASKING IS BEC THEY DONT KNOW WHAT IS HAPPENING TO CHRISTIANS ON EARTH!

      By this reality, obviously, saints above or wherever in the spirit world they may be cannot hear prayers!

      Meanwhile in purgatory:

      Revelation 6:9-11

      [9]And when he had opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God, and for the testimony which they held:

      [10]And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?
      [11]And white robes were given unto every one of them; and it was said unto them, THAT THEY SHOULD REST YET FOR A LITTLE WHILE until their fellowservants also and their brethren, that should be killed as they were, should be fulfilled.

      • “THAT THEY SHOULD REST YET FOR A LITTLE WHILE”

      Therefore, purgatory is a resting place!

      👣

      PSYCHOANALYSIS ON ISLAMIC RAPE OF CAPTIVE WOMEN!

      Indeed it is Allah’s will for consensual sex, possibly, marriage between captives and captors, in sensual attachment and allegedly “true” affection after the captors massacred the captives’ families.

      What!? 

      You have the nerve to marry the murderer of your families you personally witnessed killing them as they were pitifully dying in grotesque wide-eyed agony?!

      Sick!?

      Indeed!

      Islamic apologetics would say, there was no force applied, for captives to respond for consensual sex with their captors as it is illegal to use force.

      Ok ! Let’s say there was consent, but was it naturally free, uncompelled,  consent!? No compulsive elements such as the burden, humiliation and hardships one endures as a slave, much so if there is the emotional desire for freedom, wherein one is forced to choose a better life than being a slave!?

      Its natural response! Survival instinct!

      Put a free woman into slavery and he would do anything to be free, even accepting Islam or marry her captor. Its natural! Its instinct! We see this from news reports how the suffering of being a captive, one would go beyond his principles and converted to islam,  bec there is torments he wants to evade. 

      There is compelling reason to marry your captor! therefore, It is not free consent!

      How was a slave during those times?! 

      Excerpt 1 

      Excerpt 2

      Excerpt 3

      As you can see, the hardships of being a slave? 

      These testimonies are true as rayhana, the Jewish wife of Muhammad would later confirms.

      Now, are these not compelling reasons to marry your captors so to evade the inflicted stigma, low-level life, undignified, humiliation and much so, the hardships of being a slave?!

      It was so as expressed:

      We could only imagine how hard it was to be Islam’s slave having to desire such thing as freedom, wherein, marrying muhammad and bearing her child would free your family from slavery. 

      Such a desperate aspiration!

      Who would ever want to be a slave in the essence of being ones property, where freedom is nothing but a nagging desperate desire?!

      Its persecution! Its injustice! Its nothing but mere uncivilized custom!

      Now, back to the subject…

      WOULD YOU HAVE SEX OR MARRY YOUR CAPTOR WHO YOU WITNESSED MURDERED AND MUTILATED YOUR FATHER, MOTHER AND SIBLINGS, HAPPILY GIVING YOURSELF TO HIM WITH FREE CONSENT WITHOUT ANY ABNORMAL AND COMPELLING REASONS!?

      Its crazy!

      Noone in his normal sense under normal mental condition would ever do that if one truly loves her family!

      Nevertheless, here is islamic defense:

      REALLY!?

      WOMEN ARE ATTRACTED TO CAPTORS, THE WINNING HERO, WHO SHE WITNESSED MASSACRED HIS WHOLE FAMILY?!

      Attracted!? While bereaving?

      Its sick!!

      AND WOMEN DRESSED BEAUTIFULLY TO GAIN FAVOR OF THE WOULD BE EVER-ERECT PENIS MUSLIMS?!

      She would be ecstatic for penis after she witnessed the Muslim massacred his loved-ones!?

      Naturally, it is impossible unless the girl is sick.

      Muslims used the bible for their defense, as they quoted,

      Deuteronomy 21:10-13

      [10]When thou goest forth to war against thine enemies, and the LORD thy God hath delivered them into thine hands, and thou hast taken them captive,

      [11]And seest among the captives a beautiful woman, and hast a desire unto her, that thou wouldest have her to thy wife;

      [12]Then thou shalt bring her home to thine house; and she shall shave her head, and pare her nails;

      [13]And she shall put the raiment of her captivity (slavery) from off her, and shall remain in thine house, and bewail her father and her mother a full month: and after that thou shalt go in unto her, and be her husband, and she shall be thy wife.

      WRONG MUSLIMS! Out of context, God won’t do as you suggested, to let a captive woman who witnessed her captor murdered her family and then, marry him afterwards considering the psychological trauma she went through.

      There is psychologhical trauma, which makes it difficult for her to cope and be good and loving to her family’s murderer, unless, she is enlightened by god, for her to be converted to judaism, and acceptably, submit to its provision, so as the reality if taken in correct context.

      CAPTIVE WOMEN MUST FIRST BE CONVERTED TO JUDAISM BEFORE SHE COULD MARRY HER CAPTOR.

      What the muslim presented was the torah about marrying strange wife or foreign wife, non-israelite, heathen, who were captives whereas god disallows marriage of israel to foreigners, heathens, non-israelites, as it say,

      Ezra 10:1-3,5

      [1]Now when Ezra had prayed, and when he had confessed, weeping and casting himself down before the house of God, there assembled unto him out of Israel a very great congregation of men and women and children: for the people wept very sore.

      [2]And Shechaniah the son of Jehiel, one of the sons of Elam, answered and said unto Ezra, We have trespassed against our God, and have taken strange wives of the people of the land: yet now there is hope in Israel concerning this thing.

      [3]Now therefore let us make a covenant with our God to put away all the wives, and such as are born of them, according to the counsel of my lord, and of those that tremble at the commandment of our God; and let it be done according to the law.

      [5]Then arose Ezra, and made the chief priests, the Levites, and all Israel, to swear that they should do according to this word. And they sware.

      As you can see, marrying heathen women, captive or not, is a transgression against god, thus what DEUT21:10-13 says as marrying captive “heathen” women is in the context, that, these captive “heathen” women must be that they are converts first to judaism, having enlightenment that god is the real god and all his counsel must be authoritative, thus resultingly, she would give her free and faithful consent to submit to god, thereby, obeying god, wherefore, marriage would be plausible.

      Exodus 12:48-49

      [48]And when a stranger shall sojourn with thee, and will keep the passover to the LORD, let all his males be circumcised, and then let him come near and keep it; and he shall be as one that is born in the land (as a believer, a judaist) for no uncircumcised person shall eat thereof.

      [49]One law shall be to him that is homeborn, and unto the stranger that sojourneth among you.

      Yet, even as a convert, her decision (judgment) is to be honored. If she wants to marry her captor or not, must be honored or else, the curse is imminent for transgressors!

      Deuteronomy 27:19

      [19]Cursed be he that perverteth the judgment (decision) of the stranger, fatherless, and widow. And all the people shall say, Amen.

      RECAP:

      • GOD WANTS CAPTORS TO MARRY CAPTIVE “HEATHEN” WOMEN (SLAVES)
      • GOD PROHIBITS MARRYING HEATHENS, SLAVES OR NOT
      • STRANGERS (HEATHENS) WHO LIVE (AS SLAVES OR NOT) WITH ISRAEL AS BELIEVERS, MUST SUBMIT TO GOD UNDER ONE LAW
      • NOONE IS ALLOWED TO PERVERT OR CONTRADICTS THE DECISION OF A STRANGER (SLAVE OR NOT)

      By these reality, that god prohibits Israel to marry heathens and in other verse, allows marrying heathens, suggest one thing, these heathens (slaves) must have first to be as one with israel, logically, in matters of faith, that after one month of mourning the death of her family shall make a decision, a god given right, to marry or not his captor.

      Logic?!

      IN SHORT, IT MEANS, DONT MARRY UNGODLY HEATHENS, MARRY GODLY HEATHENS!

      How come?

      Bec one law is for both believers, heathen slaves and israel, dwelling together in the holy land and one of such is, to love god with all your hearts! Therefore, the law of marrying captive women is mutually for them! As free expression of love towards god!

      If she was given right to decide, how would he marry her captor as god suggested, in free uncompelled consent who she witnessed massacred her family if it was without acceptance of Israel’s god, and thereby, acceptance of his law?!

      Impossible!

      Would god give her right to decide, uncompelled, and yet advising her to marry her captor, if god knows that her psycholoigical trauma would prevents it to happen on a voluntary manner?!

      Is god stupid to do that?!

      Unless of course if she under normal condition, is enlightened to the reality of god, and acceptably, puts herself to submission!

      Bec if not, how could you marry someone you saw murdering your loved ones? 

      Only if you are sick!

      Therefore, captors could only marry slaves if they, as converts would by faith submit to the law, to marry their captors and with consent, free and uncompelled!

      Is that how Islam was? Did Islam allowed that slaves would first convert to islam, uncompelled, or least to say, enlightened to the fact that Allah is real and must be obefed,  before captors marry them if so, that these slaves complied in free consent?!

      WAS THERE FREE, UNCOMPELLED CONSENT?!

      NONE! 

      THERE IS COMPELLING REASON TO MARRY CAPTORS BEC IF NOT, THEY WOULD BE SLAVES, PASSED AROUND AS MERE MERCHENDISE, AND SUFFERING THE HARDNESS OF BEING SLAVES,

      SUCH AS HOW, RAYHANA, MUHAMMAD’S WIFE UNDERGO WHEN SHE WAS FORCED TO MARRY MUHAMMAD TO AVOID THE SUFFERING OF BEING A SLAVE WHICH SUFFERING I SHOWN ABOVE!

      Excerpt 4

      As you can see, Rayhana was compelled to marry Muhammad. It was not bec she was enlightened that Islam is true but bec she was forced to evade the stigma and hardship of being a slave.

      The question is, why were there women willing to marry those they witnessed brutally, psychotically, mutilated their families?!

      Its an abnormal psychological condition, a compelling involuntary reflex, for self-preservation called STOCKHOLM SYNDROME!

      Excerpt 5

      Excerpt 6

      Most psychiatrists consider Stockholm syndrome as a post traumatic stress. The need for its treatment suggests it as an abnormal condition, thus when, scholar/apologist Badam Zawadi used the one below as alibi, it is actually debunked by this psychological abnormality–stockholm syndrome!

      Conclusively, these girls attracted to murderers upon witnessing carnage, decapitated head, limbs and blood and agony upon their families were by normalcy,  impossible for sexual attraction toward the killer, unless of course if these girls are sick! 

      And as provided by psychiatrists, this illness is called Stockholm syndrome!

      Therefore, arriving to an inevitable conclusion, Allah decreed that captors should marry captive women who were mentally unstable, thus there was no real, uncompelled, and voluntary consent.

      It is an exploitation. 

      It is compulsion. 

      Whereas, when god ordered Israel to marry captives, is clearly, through uncompelled love for god, as expression of that love, being under one law such as love god with all your heart, therefore, captives marrying captors were doing it as expression of love for god!


      Exodus 12:48-49

      [48]And when a stranger shall sojourn with thee, and will keep the passover to the LORD, let all his males be circumcised, and then let him come near and keep it; and he shall be as one that is born in the land (as a believer, a judaist) for no uncircumcised person shall eat thereof.

      [49]One law shall be to him that is homeborn, and unto the stranger that sojourneth among you.

      🌙

      Now, tell us, is not Islam evil?!

      ISLAM: THE RAPIST RELIGION!



      Note: excerpts are not mine. Trace the sources by typing portions of it to your browser.

      TY.

      MUSLIM TERRORISTS LIKE ISIS ARE NOT EVIL!

      I often heard Bro eli soriano implied, sin is only imputed if acts were done by consent, not forced, and out of knowledge of the truth whereas one is sinless, however evil is the act, if it was done through ignorance or blindness of the truth. 

      Indeed! It is spoken out of divine guidance.

      This is my proof why muslim terrorists are not evil! The wisdom encapsulated in bro eli’s wisdom. Terrorists are doing evil acts by ignorance, thus, they are sinless–in other words, they are not evil.

      Terrorists think they are doing right things for god.

      Do you condemn someone who thinks he is moral and upright as faithful believer?!

      Blind people are not evil, however evil is their acts, jesus said that it is so,

      John 9:41

      [41]Jesus said unto them, If ye were blind, ye should have no sin: but now ye say, We see; therefore your sin remaineth. 

      BLIND PEOPLE, IN TERMS OF SPIRITUAL TRUTH, SUCH AS THE PHARISEES WHO KEEPS ON OPPOSING CHRIST, ARE SINLESS AS EXPLICIT IN THE VERSE!

      The only thing, a blind person is condemned is if he leads the blind to hell, that is through, mortal sins, that is unpardonable, whether youre blind or not, and through an evil heart. An example is sodomy. God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah even when they were blind and ignorant. 

      Jude 1:7

      [7]Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.

      Likewise, Noah’s flood destroyed the blind wicked people, not bec they are blind but bec their hearts were evil. 

      Genesis 6:5-7

      [5]And GOD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.

      [6]And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.

      [7]And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them.

      BLIND PEOPLE, HAVING EVIL HEARTS, AND DOING UNPARDONABLE SINS, ARE CONDEMNED MUCH SO, FOR THE BLIND CAUSING OTHERS TO BE AS EVIL OR EVEN, MORE EVIL THAN THEMSELVES ARE CONDEMNED REGARDLESS IF THEY ARE BLIND OR NOT!

      Matthew 23:15-16,33

      [15]Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves. 

      [16]Woe unto you, ye blind guides, which say, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is a debtor! 

      [33]Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell? 

      KILLING AND TERRORISM IS NOT AMONG THE UNPARDONABLE SINS FOR BLIND PEOPLE, AS EXEMPLIFIED BY HOW PAUL, BEING A TERRORIST AND MURDERER, BEC OF BLINDNESS AND IGNORANCE WAS FAVORED AND ACCEPTED BY GOD EVEN WITHOUT REPENTANCE!

      Acts 22:20

      [20]And when the blood of thy martyr Stephen was shed, I also was standing by, and consenting unto his death, and kept the raiment of them that slew him.

      Acts 26:9-11

      [10]Which thing I also did in Jerusalem: and many of the saints did I shut up in prison, having received authority from the chief priests; and when they were put to death, I gave my voice against them.

      Acts 22:4

      [4]And I persecuted this way unto the death, binding and delivering into prisons both men and women.

      1 Timothy 1:13
      [13]Who was before a blasphemer, and a persecutor, and injurious: but I obtained mercy, because I did it ignorantly in unbelief.

      Paul, being ignorant or blind, obtained mercy as he is sinless, so as jesus said in the verse above. As you can see below, there was no repentance when he received the holy spirit.

      Why would a sinless repent?! What for!?

      Acts 9:1-6,17-18

      [1]And Saul, yet breathing out threatenings and slaughter against the disciples of the Lord, went unto the high priest,

      [2]And desired of him letters to Damascus to the synagogues, that if he found any of this way, whether they were men or women, he might bring them bound unto Jerusalem.

      [3]And as he journeyed, he came near Damascus: and suddenly there shined round about him a light from heaven:

      [4]And he fell to the earth, and heard a voice saying unto him, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? 

      [5]And he said, Who art thou, Lord? And the Lord said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest: it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks. 

      [6]And he trembling and astonished said, Lord, what wilt thou have me to do? And the Lord said unto him, Arise, and go into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou must do. 

      [17]And Ananias went his way, and entered into the house; and putting his hands on him said, Brother Saul, the Lord, even Jesus, that appeared unto thee in the way as thou camest, hath sent me, that thou mightest receive thy sight, and be filled with the Holy Ghost.

      [18]And immediately there fell from his eyes as it had been scales: and he received sight forthwith, and arose, and was baptized.

      Indeed, acts done by ignorance or blindness, merits the doer accepted by god as it is a form of sinlessness. God overlooks even idolatry done in ignorance.

      Acts 17:23,29-30

      [23]For as I passed by, and beheld your devotions, I found an altar with this inscription, TO THE UNKNOWN GOD. Whom therefore ye ignorantly worship, him declare I unto you.

      [29]Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man’s device.

      [30]And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to repent:

      Repentance is required from evil things done after knowkedge of the truth. As you can see, god overlooks or winks at, on things done by ignorance, such as idolatry, even terrorism!

      Thus terrorists doing things out of blindness or ignorance are sinless thus they are not evil.

      How come?

      They think they are doing the right thing. Islamic terrorism were an act which is done by faith. 

      And by saying, terroristic acts as a form of faith to god, logically, these terrorists think they were doing the right thing as a form of faith.

      Would you condemn someone who thinks he is doing an act truthfully as he believes is the right thing?!

       He thinks he is doing it for god! Bec he thinks that is what god wants!?

      Logically, it cannot be his fault bec he do it by what he thinks is divine sanction as clearly, illustrated below:

      (source: type portions of the articles in your browser for the sources!)
      Excerpt 1


      Excerpt 2


      Excerpt 3

      Clearly, terrorists are faithful believers of Allah, doing things in the name of Islam accordingly as they believe, though these acts were done by blindness and ignorance of divine truth–the christian truth!

      Clearly, these terroristic acts were expression of faith.

      Joshua would have said the same, if ever, he was a muslim as he massacred a whole community of innocent people of jericho yet we cannot call him murderer or terrorist as these were by divine sanctions.Killing in that instance was an expression of faith. Why would god condemns terrorists expressing faith through terrorism? Much so that it was done by blindness?!

      Logically, god don’t condemns it. He called terrorists sinless–thus terrorists are not evil!

      John 9:41

      [41]Jesus said unto them, If ye were blind, ye should have no sin: but now ye say, We see; therefore your sin remaineth. 

      Mortal sins become unpardonable after doing it inspite of the fact that you have knowledge of the truth.

      Hebrews 10:26-27

      [26]For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,

      [27]But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.

      By these principle, that blind people are not evil, it is necessary that love must be an enduring aspect we should feel for all men including terrorists bec they could be sheep of Christ, immersed yet in the world of ignorance, yet without sin!

      John 10:16

      [16]And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd. 

      These sheep outside the christian fold could be anyone. They could be terrorists or anyone. Jesus would call them eventually. It could be while theyre alive or in the grave. It is inevitable. They were predestinated for it.

      Ephesians 1:4-5

      [4]According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love:

      [5]Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will,

      Thus, as compulsory, we must love terrorists! Or anyone, for the sake of love! even without being loved in return!

      Matthew 5:46

      [46]For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? do not even the publicans the same? 

      THESE BIBLICAL REALITIES REPUDIATES ANY ILL-FEELINGS TOWARDS TERRORISTS, BEC, THEY COULD BE SHEEP OF CHRIST INITIALLY WANDERING YET BLINDLY THROUGH THEIR EFFORTS TO PLEASE WHO THEY KNOW IS THE REAL GOD, YET A DECEIVER, AND BEING DECEIVED, AS EVE WAS IN EDEN, GOD ACCEPTS THEM STILL!

      AND BEING BLIND, THEY ARE NOT EVIL!